>>5584
>>5581
>>I also considered calling it /r/-random or /sp/-shitposting but I just thought it but more /endpone/ to have some chating partly encouraged besides just randomness
>full randomness for a community of this kind doesn´t work all that well. Maybe if we lived in 2011-12, I would dig that direction but I don´t think that much randomness can be displayed from a limited number of users.
>
>I mean, we could have a feast of shitposts but it would fade really quickly.
I like randomness. I am sometimes disgusted by those who value order so much and have a certain idea about how things should be. (The quote "Chaos is a ladder" means that you can ascend the ranks in turbulent or confusing times where truth is not well known or has disappeared.)

>>10307
I remember year(s) ago I learned about Halo lore. I thought it was a "really cool story". Too bad that the Halo TV/streaming series was so shit (as I've heard).

These two videos https://inv.tux.pizza/watch?v=oCTU64eS7K4 and https://inv.tux.pizza/watch?v=b8YKacEI-z0 answer these questions:

>Fewest amount of enemies to kill to beat Halo 3?
One. The Monitor has to be killed by the player character. Spoiler: a guy in that video said that Guilty Spark survived later on, was he truly ever dead? What about humans who get cryogenically frozen IRL? If a future technology proves that they can be completely revived then maybe they were only medically dead and not truly dead?

>Can you beat Halo 3 with only [weapon]?