>>114626
>a decent amount of them would mention it
I still don't quite believe women just saying it (actions louder than words), but I'll keep what you've been saying in mind. I sure wish I'm wrong about women, and that they're not utterly shallow with the same tastes.
>no shortage of women like that
Kinda hard to believe that when a ton of unattractive men are single\virgins, not to mention hypergamy.
>I don't think women in general get off on highly specific male features honestly, it seems like it's always about more broad things. Height instead of long limbs, fatness instead of moobs/gut, etc. Whereas men are more likely to hone in on specific body parts and clothing items and features.
That's a very good point, and one I hadn't considered.
>These women were NOT trying to avoid seeming shallow lmao
Women will lie even if it's to themselves, so ehhh idk.
>some studies done
That sounds interesting, I'd like to take a look at those studies too.

If what you're claiming is true, I believe it would help a lot of men out there. But only if it's true.