>>119319
>>119317
>both replies within minutes of each other in the same exact FEMININE typing style
Lmao. Pukara, this isn't healthy. There are plenty of men here who aren't just obese pedrophiles with corruption fetishes, so yeah, I'm sorry to tell you that plenty of anons have spoken about how a girl who's had some sex is still preferable to a mentally ill BPD e-thot who's pimped herself out and destroyed her root chakra for random men she didn't even know online.
>we want cute untouched teens not bitter used up women like you
This is very obviously something written by a teenage female, and you're retarded for thinking it's not obvious. Not even actual fucking pedrophiles write like that. It's like you've never even looked at any thread other than your own. If you did, you would realize that almost no one at all on this board cares about whether or not a girl is a QTPUREVIRGINWAIFU. Even if they did, you wouldn't make the cut. Only a woman would be illogical enough to think the line is drawn at fucking and not, you know, being a whore at the youngest age possible for tons of dudes. You are very stupid.