>>35574
i think the window for such a switch (or even a balanced "normie" one) has passed. these threads are evidence items #1-15. not all people are equipped to handle fame/attention (however slight/esoteric), and ken clearly wants to dictate the terms of her online presence

as it recedes into the past, i'm more and more leaning towards her "online era" being an anomaly, an attempt at fitting in by donning a certain type of persona. there's a common thread of awkwardness that runs through her posted images, egirl with training wheels (that said, i do believe the majority of her interests are genuine (no one asked faget))

>>35580
try putting yourself in her shoes for just a second