>>72089
>They are literally teenagers by definition
Yes, that's the problem, it's only by technicality. When people use "teenagers" colloquially, they usually mean something like 13-17, not 18/19. It's deliberately deceptive to make the man seem worse.
EVEN IF women were 100% right on this, which they aren't, just the fact that they'd be manipulative about it is wrong in itself.
>not having the emotional maturity
Then I guess we should raise the voting age for women. Problem solved. Heck, we should have her father pick out suitors for her, too. Since she's so unable to do it herself.
>partner double the other's age
Here's another one of those "rules" people come up with.
It really fucking reminds me of the "rules" women make up to get out of paying for dates
>oops whoever invites pays for everyone haha
>whoever earns more pays for everyone
Conveniently 99% of the time it's the man who fits these criteria. Fucking shit.