>>713156
No. That's wrong as well.
I want a legally enforceable amendment that says a worker can accept 30 min shifts and only get paid for that.
It would be a good deal with all the transport and med shifts that only take 15 mins, and you could do 3 (or more if they live together) in an hour.
I was told by an ex union boss guy that there was a "negotiable working hours" contract. Which could allow 12hr shifts, without a break, as well as those 30 min shifts, if the worker agreed to it.
Instead of how I would do it now, which is two shifts with two workers because I'd get slogged overtime rates, if it was just one worker.
It works for some workers, and I've done it before. I didn't know it was illegal.. For two consenting adults with qualifications and clearances to agree on working conditions.
There was one worker at a previous company I worked at who did 60+ hr weeks and loved it. There wasn't any overtime, it was just a flat rate. The alternative was limiting her to 38, more like 35. So missing out an at least another grand. None of us got paid super either.. which is illegal but we were all told. Most of us anyway.
Negotiable working conditions isn't real.