>>22275
>that appear to depict minors enga-
Yeah they were referring to ACTUAL, identifiable minors that exist in real life, not cartoons. That's what minor means, it does not apply to a fiction underage character?
>y-you're fiction defe-
Nigga, when did I say I "defended" anything? I'm telling you there's a difference between the actual hurt people out there in the world and the cartoons that have no victims inside them (in which the cartoon is fake, not real).

And the latter doesn't make your shit post any true. No I'm not a "pedo" for telling y ou rational sense instead of "HURR DURR THIS RANDOM GUY EATS POOP AND IS A WAAH WAAHH PEDO" all the time like a screaming banshee.

Also we aren't even talking about pornography, at least none of the images of my family are even porn, you putrid dumbass.
>>22250
Stop repeating yourself you massive retard.