>>39280
>proving my point on posting the same images, often being incorrect/illogical "reasonings"
thanks for being immature, and below intelligence.
and no sane person considers a fetish "infantile". why would someone claim that an nsfw picture of a character wearing diapers and cumming in them "infantile"?
>realis-
you're not UK moron
>w-who said the-
they are jokes. and they are bad. you suck at making jokes compared to other comedians