>>12575
tbh I saw the first post as a veiled threat, and the second as one that condoned such a threat and gave it credibility.
the reason given in the report itself is bullshit, I'm assuming it's the same guy, but a lot of global reports come through with weak reasoning and stuff that doesn't add up to the given reason.
but when I saw what was posted it had all the characteristics of a call to violence that can't be tolerated.