>>6965
>that fag who wrote that would deserve a ban just because he is a malicious shit stirrer
I'm not sure if something has been lost in translation, but if you're referring to this post >>6070 then I have no idea what the hostility and ban-threats are in aid of.
I literally just pointed out that a video of a pornstar taking a dick up her ass was left alone while a non-nude post of another girl (also over 18) was removed.
The removal wasn't explained and seemed inconsistent at the time, and I stand by that statement.