>>128
>Anyway, my point is that you're not providing an argument in favor of mixed marriage from this text.
Nothing I've said before obliges me to do so for one and secondly I don't recall anything specific that would be directly encouraging it. It's being left at individual's discretion.
In general if law doesn't forbid something that means it's legal. Statement "Christianity is anti miscegenation" is false. That is my point.