>>215
>Again, you keep blabbering on to no avail.
Unfortunately apparently I am since you again show you don't understand what I wrote.

I'll skim the parts you're not showing any sings of getting and focus on few that might go through.
>Abraham was once a polytheist, but he had faith in God via his grace, and he was righteous.
Hmm... It's like despite being fallen man he didn't need the Law after all.
>Nonsense.
1 Corinthians 15:56
>it's a condemnation of what the Pharisees believed the Law was
It's what the Law is. It's what was written and what Jesus quoted before issuing corrections. Nothing what Jesus talked about in these corrections was within the Levitical Law. Addition is a form of correction and if you read further you also have removals and substitutions. We have laws against murder today too, ask a lawyer if Jesus' interpretation is legally sound.
>This is what the "Spirit of the Law" you talk of is, it is NOT a rejection of the Law, not one bit.
It effectively is rejection of what was written and substitution with the Law of Love. If you love your neighbour so much you won't even say a word that might hurt him emotionally you're not going to kill him. You either live under the Law of Moses which doesn't satisfy God and causes you to fall under a curse from which you've been delivered by Jesus Christ or you live in the Spirit under the Law of Love. Your choice.
>you disagree with Paul
I disagree with what you've said. If it was for fallen man it would've been given to Adam right away and that's subtly different from what Paul writes about.
>we are still a fallen people who are saved by Christ
Are you saved or are you fallen? Your flesh may yet sin but you've died to flesh and you live in Christ through faith.