>>512
The spelling errors in >>510 were intentional (not really typos). It was some form a self-example or meta-example.
The idea of the post >>510 was to encourage the exposure of errors of any type that people can find in any information of God's Community.

This thread ("Questions & questions" >>431) is designed to create reactions in people, and at the moment, it is working!
In order to be a real community, it is necessary, that others than me (at least one), collaborate/interact in God's Community.