>>2805
Language itself is a means to understanding but is not cognition. A baby can experience and understand many things before it can even speak. I don't always think in English yet I can't describe that mode of thinking in words alone.

Conventional understanding of words and the metaphysical reconstruction of the understanding behind the words have two different "descriptions", though the conventionally derived definition being dependent on context, the metaphysically arrived explanation being denotative and connotative not truly dependent on context. A restructuring of this magnitude is something super autistic metaphysicians can tackle but it's not really my forte to do something like that though I would consider it.