>>187
>Every time I show evidence of police misconduct or corruption you try to dodge it one way or another such as straw-manning my arguments.

Because it only proves that these things happen which I never said they didn't, not the context behind them or how they relate to the Police as a whole, again you are essentially using the actions of one black man to paint all of them.

>If the cops were to bust down your door and kill you family you'd probably say they deserved it.

Well clearly I would have a personal and emotional bias just as you do now if something like that happened and I would not be able to take a step back just as you cannot now.

>You can't even admit that the protests and rioting isn't just about George Floyd so I'm calling it a day, I made my point and provided evidence.

Your evidence proves nothing and often goes country to what you yourself are saying, like when you are saying how bad the police are because of shooting a news crew with rubber bullets, yet the same article notes he was punished for it but of course you ignore that.

Good, maybe you will have some time to reflect on this and realise that you need to look at the world as it and not just as it appears thought your narrow lenses.