Bernd 07/30/2020 (Thu) 16:40:33 No.38872 del
>>38867
I was reflecting to his line here >>38829
>Article is one-sided though, it links gluten and gluten-like diet with problems that started thousands years ago, but not accounting positive changes from that time.
So I did not have the need to list all the supposed findings of the paper, just the line which give to cereals their due. If you had followed the course of the discussion I shouldn't have told you this. But for some reason you ignore what I really write and try to insert a narrative which doesn't exist outside your imagination: that I'm completely against everything you post. And you do this all the time. Instead of really considering what I said, you go ahead and figure I pick on you so here it is, now I do, which I don't ever in normal circumstances. I've no idea why you do this.

Anyway. The whole human civilization was built on grain, it is just too good source of nutrients (first and foremost calories) to pass on. Yeah, there is a "dark side", even if we consider it's role in obesity, and don't go down this lane of mental disorders it might cause, we can declare we should balance out our diet. In many countries it's possible to do it, even in Eastern Europe. Bit more meat, vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, diary products, little less cereals would mean a lot.
However there are lots of cereals, even rice has over 9000 subspecies. How each fare? How about buckwheat for example? Or different type of millets?