>>38967
Well that's Omnicidism but it still holds true for everybody who doesn't follow that and most people do not. Even for Omicidism follows it still sounds like an excuse.

You are whining, the hold ideology is whining how can it not be? You offer a solution to a problem only you and people like you have because off the way your own personal lives have gone yet you try to apply it to everyone and everything regardless of how happy they are with their own lives. You are babies throwing a tantrum over a slide that hurt you because you didn't use it right and then demanding it be removed and ruining everybody else's fun.

It's a dumb counter point. So you would advocate a billionaire living the time of his life should never be born or live at all because he stubs his toe or has a bad day once? It's about balance, you can't reasonably say that everybody should die because of the fact that suffering exists when it gets counter balanced by numerous other things. If it's not counter balanced then maybe that individual should die, and that is when people kill themselves.

No you can't, you are advocating removing life, how can that be altruistic or improve anything?