>>41281
>I wrote what they think, what they base their reasoning, how they justify the new laws coming.
Got you.
>What you do in your bedroom too.
No, this is not at all comparable. I guess one could say that "what one does in the bedroom" is a public matter when e.g. one is building a nerve gas bomb in his bedroom. In such case it is the "public" (or those purporting to represent the public) who may have an interest in the "private". But this not at all what I meant. Religion is a public matter primarily because its raison d'etre is influencing, guiding, "helping", "saving" the public. Religion is not a pastime. Notice that I refer to "religion", the institution(s) -the "real" ones, not the fake-and-gay ones-, and not to personal religious practice, which is most of what you allude to.
>>41293
>Islam of Enlightenment
Yeah I guess they don't really hide it. Should just call it unitarian islam, and merge it with "christianity of enlightnement" as well, because what difference does it make? It's the same universalist "enlightenment" in a slightly different attire. Or maybe "scientific islam". Science is good, who could possibly object lol?