>>42402
>If you [West] condemn Turkey for its presence and fighting in Iraq, Syria, Libya and Nagorno-Karabakh, then you should not pay Turkey to stop the migrants who come from warzones to enter Europe. This policy does not get on well with the West [which does not exist anymore] and its virtues, that it utters from time to time.
Can you see how the western liberast ideology twists around their own throats?
Any reasonable European would consider the first sentence utterly fallacious. WTF is the problem with condemning the warring while also implementing policies (such as economic incentives) to prevent consequences of these wars (massive immigration from alien people) from negatively affecting your nation(s)? The problem, the german politician seems to recognise in the second sentence, lies in what he calls "Western virtues", but which really have little to do with traditional virtues and are just the degenerate and hypocritical sensitivities of sorosites on one side of the coin and the by-design globalist projects of neo-libs/neo-cons on the other.

>>42407
>The recent highway thing is quite fragile.
In what sense do you mean this? Do you refer just to the fact that the connection depends on a single piece of civil infrastructure, or do you have doubts about Russia's security guarantees for the project?