>>44465
>Pseudoscience doesnt mean you are wrong...
I concur with everything you wrote. But see the following.
In Hungarian historiography as far as back to the late 19th century there was (and still is) an "official", sometimes called "academic" line of research and education, especially on the field of Hungarian prehistory (them labeled as "Finnugrists"). As the opposite of them, there is a "national" researchers, who are looking into alternative explanations (how alternative, the palette is very colorful and wide).

Note:
Those participating in the official research always denied the official research's existence, saying there is no official and national, but there is history and pseudoscience, them researching history ofc. These are noted scientists, holding high positions in universities and in the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Those participating national historiography are the ones who came up with this categorization, pointing out how the "official" researchers and professors handling history ex cathedra style. They consider themselves national, because they believe the official line serves foreign interests (they frequently subscribe to /pol/-tier ideas as well, about Jews and such), and the academists/Finnugrists are anti-nationalist, mostly socialists, and lately liberals. They have some truth in that considering during the 40 years of communism, very few people getting positions in education and research could avoid politics, if any could - quite a few nationalist researchers are/were emigrants (mostly US and Argentina). Before 1945 however, things were different.