Bernd
09/16/2021 (Thu) 19:23:06
No.45016
del
09/16/2021 (Thu) 19:23:06
No.45016
del
>>45007
It's safe enough. But there's also the issue of being prime target for nuclear strikes. On the other hand unless you live in a village far from everything it is always an issue. On the third hand with just a little luck we'll avoid a nuclear war, right now the danger is pretty small.
>>45010
>Washington wants China to play by their rules, under which the US-as-single-world-hegemon statu quo will be preserved
>rules-based international world order" is just euphemism for US hegemony
This is true, but if one from any of the Anglo countries why not be glad for that, and consider it The Rules?
Now since I'm from a relatively small country, our interest is in the balance of larger powers so neither can keep us under their thumb (too much). Still the US is more dominant around the globe, and some advance on behalf of China can't hurt yet.
It's safe enough. But there's also the issue of being prime target for nuclear strikes. On the other hand unless you live in a village far from everything it is always an issue. On the third hand with just a little luck we'll avoid a nuclear war, right now the danger is pretty small.
>>45010
>Washington wants China to play by their rules, under which the US-as-single-world-hegemon statu quo will be preserved
>rules-based international world order" is just euphemism for US hegemony
This is true, but if one from any of the Anglo countries why not be glad for that, and consider it The Rules?
Now since I'm from a relatively small country, our interest is in the balance of larger powers so neither can keep us under their thumb (too much). Still the US is more dominant around the globe, and some advance on behalf of China can't hurt yet.