>>45078
I get the quip, nicely said, but I'll just pedantically clarify that:
- a cryptographic system with a public blockchain, if such a thing could be successfully designed and securely implemented (lol), although probably impenetrable for untrained people, could be susceptible of formal or quasi-formal mathematical proofing and algorithmic validation. Which is what would make it "at least interesting"
- "oracle" is a technical term