>>46554
>a grudge towards han, manchu, and other subgroups
Millions of Chinese hold grudges against other subgroups, that's just natural in a large and diverse country. He's also a minority. His unorthodox beliefs about who are the Han and what is China can be reached by any other Chinese with access to his sources, though not all will get to his conclusions. Maybe he even thinks China would be better off balkanized, but even that doesn't necessarily mean he thinks it's a viable political program that people should work towards. And there are many other things he has to take into account to reach his conclusion of "what ought to happen", maybe he doesn't even have one. Just because there are three groups of Chinese dissidents doesn't mean they're the only three groups, nor that, because he doesn't belong to two of them, he belongs to the other. He even contradicts himself a bit on whether he's a dissident.
I have my regional grudges and I think Brazilian states are latent proto-nationstates whose unification was a historical accident and some of them even have a shaky claim to being part of historical colonial "Brazil". Am I operationally aligned with my country's enemies? No, because there are a lot of other things I think about. This Chinaman has never been favorable to liberals or a "color revolution", I don't think he sees himself as aligned with a Western destruction of China. He most definitively doesn't think his worldview comes from the West.
>He is also 21.
He's better informed than either one of us.
>But maybe you would prefer that we drop the seriousdiscussion and just try to bait each other?
He's also baiting and shitposting in one way or another. But it's like posting "Germany is a fake country" on an imageboard, it's plausible to reach that conclusion from history and even if it's wrong it doesn't come from nowhere.