>>51762
>What isn't?
Utopian fallacy

> Lots of them are considered objective scientific works.
Humanities is just one step away from these idiots which I don't consider an achievement.

Statistics hardly ever provide full picture, ignoring economics(which is closest thing to pass as science in social science), neither infotaintment and such videos.

We need a thing called 'eyetest' if you're not familiar with the term, it's mostly used by sports community in US, emphasizing shortcomings of statistics dependency and only watching highlights, in this case this video is more or less equivalent of highlights.

I understand social science is way more complicated than sports, but the reason sports emphasize eyetest is not because they're simpler, it's because there are stakes for getting things right. Meanwhile no social scientist, youtuber, social media shill or local ignorant get punished for getting things wrong but only speaking against certain norms.

Social scientists benefit from this, because with that they can have more status despite not achieving shit. People wrongfully think almost all clases try their best to do what they're obliged but we know that's not true.

My general opinion is just, it caters to stereotypes by morons indulging in to stereotypes. It almost always get increasingly ignorant and even hostile for every inch they get away from western europe.