/nc/ - nanochan

We shall be victorious.

Boards | Catalog | Bottom

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Drawing x size canvas

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

(41.75 KB 474x334 crusader.jpg)
Crusades Anonymous 05/29/2019 (Wed) 07:46:05 [Preview] No. 51 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Do you guys think that every crusade were justified? I as a christian believe that some were justified but I think others may have differing opinions.

Anonymous 05/26/2019 (Sun) 21:28:58 [Preview] No. 4 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Thank you. Hopefully, I can hang with you bros for as long as possible.

Anonymous 05/26/2019 (Sun) 21:34:14 [Preview] No.5 del
Nanochan may not even go down as Hakase said that he may give it over to the anon larping as the cartoon character.

Anonymous 05/26/2019 (Sun) 22:38:01 [Preview] No.8 del
I hope it will be that guy with PGP key. At least he had his cryptography sort of right.
Also, avatarfaggots and attention whores are the worst chan owners you can ever imagine.

Anonymous 05/27/2019 (Mon) 07:56:19 [Preview] No.9 del
hakase said first come, first served, IIRC, and Staravatarfag was first. I agree that he'd probably be a disaster, though, from a technical standpoint, if nothing else. Really didn't seem to know his stuff. And, yeah, avatarfags are generally insufferable.

Of course, it's not like hakase is particularly reliable or consistent, anyway, so he may very well say "fuk it, i know i said first come, first served, but it's goin' to PGPfag anyway lel."

I can't really blame him for killing nano, though. The quality of the site was always hit-or-miss, and it's been pretty bad lately, though part of that was due to incompetent administration, e.g. splitting /b/ up. He sees that it's shit. I see that it's shit. I guess at least several nanons are already experiencing anticipatory nostalgia about an IB that's less than a year old, though.

It is a pity, though. I've written before on nano and elsewhere that what made imageboards special was never the technology, but a certain spirit of freedom and creativity that depends on a kind of secret-sauce combination of the userbase and the administration working in a certain format. 4chan had it and lost it long ago, even before the big exodus to 8. 8chan had it briefly for months or maybe even as little as a few weeks. It was definitely gone by the time Freddit was turned into hog feed. Nanochan...maybe had an inkling of it? Or, perhaps, had the potential for it; a potential that never matured.

Oh well. Lightning already struck twice. Asking for three times was probably asking too much.

Anonymous 05/27/2019 (Mon) 22:27:43 [Preview] No.36 del
i don't completely disagree but the freedom you appreciate also opens it up to people who post maliciously. 4chan didn't have armies of ideologues and well-funded activists seeking to destroy it. how many billionaires gave a fuck about shitposting in the 00s?