This issue could be discussed within the Endware thread, it doesn't need a new thread.

I hold copyright over the files and have given freedoms to do what is said in the license (Run, Copy, Modify, Share, Sell, Bundle etc. ) .

The only thing that I seriously prohibit is someone claiming that they made it and then close sourcing it and patenting the technology. I might show up to court to challenge that, and I wouldn't need lawyers to back me up.

Which clause wouldn't be enforceable?

Which clauses do you object to?

Which license are you suggesting that I change it to and why? Which clauses are causing you to be unable to use the software?

How would you prefer me to modify them ?

Do you like the software ? Which software pieces from the suite do you use most often and why? Do you think this software is good enough and useful enough to benefit from a standard free software license? Which would be the best license to apply in your opinion and why?

Thanks for your feedback.