>>1186

>You did not address the majority of my points, and those you did address you did not seem to fully understand and did not address adequately. Your dismissal is dismissed.

You lied and said that "Why didn't you say X instead?", when I had done that exact thing in the next line of my license. You used this strategy 3 times, and I pointed out all three times and the exact line where I included EVERYONE, EVERYWHERE, and those of non belief etc.

So you lied to win an argument you started. That would be plain to anyone who reads the thread, reads my license and then reads my response to your tactic.

>It's a moot point, because it would be a minor miracle if more than a half dozen people or so ever use your software (or even become aware of it), so your ridiculous license doesn't really matter,

https://github.com/endwall2/endware/stargazers

I count 15. But from reading my hidden service logs I think its somewhat higher than that.

I have to go to school now, and I'm busy until Thursday with quizzes and assignments, I'll address the remainder of your other points then, for my edification. I may revise the license after that and update it to remedy anything I feel needs to be changed. Thank you for your input.