>>78405
It's funny you say this as by simply not being uncaring of Christianity you declare me anti Christian by someone proposing a path forward that relies on us and our strength rather than your own desire to propagate a system that has inherently failed to defeat what it itself considers one of it's greatest threats, that of Jewish power. You have helped me make a decision on something I had been making some light footed drafts on, courtesy of your mewling you have reminded me of the distaste your ilk leave me with your need for self insertion of proselytizing and hollow words such as "God will save us, just wait for God" whenever something disagrees with your frail viewpoint with the usual accusation of the "masonic" to hide your inability to argue against understanding the greater part of our people when it is not through the lens of Christianity. You propose that we just move back to what led us here in the first place. Never save yourselves, never find faith in yourselves or to ideals of your peoples by looking realistically at what forged them. Just trust and all will be well. "Oh it's because we strayed from God's light". "Oh it's because were all sinners". Very droll. As a people we existed long before Christianity and so we shall long after. I do not go against the idea of God or the spirit for both are intrinsic to us as a people but I will gladly go against those who would make us continue upon a path of self destruction that Christianity now leads us upon with it's constant self flagellation and inability to effect change.

>>78409
I have never professed admiration for him nor would I but his work *is* useful if divided from his personal opinions. He does understand certain European qualities that we must rediscover, that is what I "preach", not adherence to his every word. His work can be used to augment understanding of leadership principles, we should use it in the same way one can understand semetic tricks by reading the 48 Laws of Power. His unwarranted ignorance concerning National Socialist principles or the Jewish issue should indeed be pointed out as should his eventual descent into insanity but much like modern culture we should take what we can use and abandon the items without worth which is fairly evident in the case of Evola. His opinions on topics beyond tradition and leadership are akin to the opinions of a chef on flower arrangements at a dinner table. Yes, he may have a vague idea but it lacks nuance or understanding of what is being spoken of.