>>93991
This is maybe the only really useful thread in this whole board. A shame it took so much to get this up.

That said, there are few things which should be clarified:
1) Is this thread only for finalized plans, or also for discussing the plans into more detail or about the general setup of said plans?
2) What can be done about the jews lurking here, who will use this thread as a warning sample to test their next poisoning attacks and to prepare counter plans against any plan even remotely suggested here?
As in, is it really wise to discuss plans in the open if the tactic used is one of surprise attack?

About the matter of discussing plans in the open, I've a suggestion about how to proceed on that, any plan discussed openly should be devised to be effective even if it's known by the enemy, maybe even the main trait or quality of open plans should be precisely that immunity to counters, the core of the plan comes second.

The effectiveness of a plan when it's known by the enemy, as far as I know, can run over 3 schemes or models:
1) the enemy is unable to do anything about the plan even if they know about it, as in the plan is out of reach for the enemy
2) the enemy knowing about the plan is going to further play into the plan effectiveness, as in, the counter-reaction to the plan should be incorporated into the plan itself to have a reiforcing effect for the plan. The aim is for the plan to grow stronger the more the enemy knows about it.
3) play the enemy over a dilemma, if they react to he plan the plan gains more power, if they don't react to it the plan continues its course. Meaning the plan will have become immune to the reactions of the enemy because the enemy is now scared to react to it fearing they may worsen their position if the do react to it

In most cases a plan devised to be resistant to the enemy reactions, and so the only plans worth discussiong openly, such plans must often be compopsed of two or more parts.
An active part, the "punch which hurts" of the plan.