>>11178
NO, it is not.
Deltas were not meant to apply to some rando anon & POTUS tweet. This was tried many times on 8ch and it's nonsense.

>>11177
>Are we trying to validate some rando here as Q or discredit such?
The latter would be the effect of this effort.

>>11180
My apology then. Yesterday someone was desperately trying the same thing, blurred out the (you) on his own post (and nominated it several times) as well as blurring out the hour on POTUS tweet(s).

I'm not saying in any way that this board is not monitored, that POTUS has no idea we're here or what we're doing. I'm saying that deltas weren't meant to be compared to random posts!

Think it through
IF you could say that 'POTUS tweeted something 2 minutes from this post' or '17 minutes from this post' it could be anything. It could and would be used to connect anything to POTUS/Q as 'proof' for any agenda or motive. ANYTHING AT ALL.

It could and would be used (exploited) by /badpeople/.