>>11504
Image is too small to read and no link.

>>11506
There is no need to provide "counter proof". The entire premise that you can take any numbers or words in any anons' post and apply them to POTUS tweet and it is therefore "proof" is faulty. Clearly there is a fundamental misunderstanding of what deltas were and were for.

Those deltas were meant to provide proof that Q was either with, in proximity of, or working with POTUS.

On 8ch, some people tried to apply deltas to their own posts or posts near Q posts to bolster whatever point they were trying to make. It didn't work because that wasn't the focus or intention of the deltas. It was a misapplication of the principle.

It has now devolved into something strangely personal, that whether the premise is correct or not reflects on one or more anons. And anyone who points out the obvious is called a shill. Confirmation bias can be a bitch, especially when the issue is personal: if wrong, then it hurts feelings/pride. Objectivity is lost and greater and greater attachment to the issue is shown which leads to ignoring logic and objective facts.

8kun in 48 hrs +/- hopefully, and this entire issue will be moot.