>>6802
Good catch, and not to take away from your point, but this line
>AG Sessions cannot look like an impartial player
>impartial player
Except he HAD to look impartial, willing to go after lawbreaking regardless of party affiliation (impartial)

If Sessions was going after former Obama team members, then he would appear partial, not impartial!

That was one of those (potential) typos that wasn't highlighted, nor was it corrected. I've pondered that one for quite a while now. I still have no answer.

And look at that zero reference, kek