>>118733
Perhaps I should've just questioned why bother to look a the report. When you know they are lying.
I believe you implied that when you compared her ceri with the one from 100 years ago? since there was less info on the modern - which would be expected?
To me it wouldn't prove that they were lax necessarily, since being lax on death certi-s and lying medical examiners is the "new normal" (from decades ago, already) anyway.
We see the dancing nurses killing people outright in the hospitals, so of course they will lie on the death certi-s?
And getting paid for each COVID patient they kill?
It's endemic - maybe they paid special attention to the certi of Diamond? But only because they knew it would be of public interest?
Even so, in your opinion, it lacked data. Did they finally remedy that, adding new info?
Or is that just more lying news reports?

>>118553 "cause of death revealed"
isn't that a fake headline
She didn't have covid, (their tests are bunk, in any case, according to the man who created the tests)
she wasn't sick with anything flu like.
She was injected.
+ sudden Heart failure.
what does that equal?