Anonymous 07/13/2024 (Sat) 03:52 Id: dc2d58 No.142903 del
>>142898, >>142899

Did the January 6th U.S. attorneys and federal judges sign the required oaths of office

Frank Rocco Giustino
@FrankRoccoG
Great. Now it should be realized that all January 6th U.S. attorneys and federal judges have not signed the required oaths of office to even impose such a charge.
They are not lawfully or legally bonded officials. 👇

---

USDC D.C. January 6th "Chief Judges" BOASBERG & HOWELL signed illegally changed Oaths of Office, Refused for Cause for fraud on Frank Rocco's January 6th Case #23-cr-16 court record, deliberately ignored by BOASBERG.
Compare Title 28 U.S.C. §453 "So help me God" in proper form as prescribed by Congress under the Constitution to corporative CAPITONYM form, "SO HELP ME GOD." Oaths of Office for justices and judges cannot be changed without approval by Congress. See Title 28 U.S.C. §453 and its amendments.
Lead January 6th "Attorney" Prosecutor @USAO_DC
Matthew M. GRAVES has a redacted signature from his Oath of Office, as witnessed by fraudulent former "Chief Judge" Beryl Alaine HOWELL.
@TheJusticeDept "Assistant Attorney" Prosecutor Douglas COLLYER admits to Court-appointed public defender that he did not sign any Oath of Office for his federal prosecution, with public defender Evan SUGAR then misinforming J6 Defendant Frank Rocco that there are no signed Oaths of Office as documents for federal prosecutors and judges at all.
"Judges" and "Attorney" Prosecutors practicing without valid civil and/or judicial Oaths of Office can be subjected to criminal impersonation charges under Title 18 U.S.C. §912.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.