>>6758
>AI is just methodology, it's not really different than having Chinese slave-workers do the animation in essence, if they aren't actually adding any spirit to it
My problem is with the "vomit". Chink workers usually use raw materials and turn it into a product while this uses recently made big data with energetic signatures all over the place then it is taken apart and reshaped into "art". Even that thing how chinks make cooking oil from sewage water cannot compare. While you might say an artist can also gain inspiration from many things it will usually have a theme even if the theme is "insanity". And the worst part it uses big data which means overall it is not insane at all but the most common themes turned into specific things with the power of AI.
I don't know how to explain my disgust. We have the AIslop meme already but it's different. Food or even "slop" is edible while vomit is theoretically can be still edible but at that level it contains digestion fluids. And it's hard to return it to the original thing while if you analyze properly you can deduct what it was originally. But AI still goes and makes it look like the original without utilizing the original creation process. But yes it's not creation but a "methodology". You might say everything is methodology in a sense but I don't know.
I am not exactly critiquing AI here but trying to understand this weird feeling I have towards it. Intellectually I know what it is and why things look like that but my newly attuned "senses" are bothered by this abomination.
>A lot of people don't know what they are doing and are just following pre-learned formats
Yeah and they create most of the big data and usually train the AI.
>This may be why AI is outcompeting them now
I too love the articles that say
>How the AI is the most dangerous for female dominated jobs
and similar things. Barely useful jobs that even a child could do is in trouble. People who managed to learn a single profession and only in position because some retarded quotas will die... and I am not complaining about that. People being proud of their useless occupation and even earning big money with that then they prop up the most worthless industries with their consumerism is one of the most dangerous cancer we have nowadays. The fucking normalfag problem was about simple minded moralists back then but nowadays? They are mentally unhinged retards with different levels of brainwashing.

>humans do worse with this in many areas.
(((Modern))) humans? Definitely. This is why everyone is getting replaced by machines when it is possible. It's just not worth keeping and managing that many humans. You either have strict labor law and a wellfare system for everyone where more humans = more trouble so you try to reduce the main source of problem. Or every human is easy to be replaced the moment something goes wrong with minimal repercussions or investment and humans are better suited for these kinds of works. It all boils down how much human resource you have around and how harshly you can punish failure. Pain and terror is not always the worst punishment. Sometimes it's worse when you get replaced like nothing happened with someone who is better at you in every regard. The question comes after that ofc. Why was he better? Was it genetics or random occurrences or the system was fucked and it ruined you while doing the work while prepared others to take over once you are not fit anymore? There is a reason why media cries "competency crisis". Sometimes they are not "better" just merely cheaper and ask less questions. It's nothing new tho. Every generation cried "BACK IN MAH TIME" since history started. But nowadays without cheap immigrant labor large companies cannot show big numbers to shareholders and once the company breaks down it just gets merged into an another. Eternally happy shareholders. Sadly this happened with the USSR too but instead of shareholders you had board directors who also didn't understand the corruption that they fed with their negligence.