>>578
>Can't we all just get along? All I am saying is give piece a chance.

That's exactly the type of commie fantasy you're critizising and only works in a totalitarian surveillance dystopia. As soon as even a single of your opponents simply doesn't want to get along with you, you're fucked unless you are stronger and able to deter or kill him first. You can't make peace with an invader who wants to eradicate you except by committing suicide. And even if a peace agreement is reached, it is dictated by the winner, the loser can only accept or perish.

You can be peaceful but that's a privilege of the strongest who do not even need to fight as no one would dare to challenge them. As a lion would not attack a mouse. If you are too weak to even harm your opponent you are not peaceful. You are harmless and at the mercy of others.