>>931145
I have great respect for your pedostomping, could still reach the server through one front end. I got through.

Old images so the hash should have already been in a unified ban list. I'm pretty sure these can be implemented internally and reported anonymously for reasons of user privacy.
Given that none were obfuscated I suspect it was random spam, if dead boards on chanlist got hit it would tend to confirm that. Might be less work if it becomes a recurrent issue.