>>13986
Please - look at the official documents linked here: >>13956 The second is to Congress, the first is a declassified report.

Note the letterhead, the headers & footers (with page #s), the font, the structure (outline, headings, subheadings).

Compare those -or any other official document from the SDIG office to what was posted here from the Russian site, which purports to be a brief to Congress, which would be an official document.

Think it through for a moment.

Do you really think that the letterhead, structure, formatting and font are all the sudden going to change? Government doesn't work like that. The documents from the Russian site look nothing like actual SDIG official documents.

>I didn't see any "actual documents" posted FOR ME. What do you mean?
I posted links to actual official SDIG documents and the website itself here >>13956 for (you) and all anons to see for yourselves.

I would absolutely love it if the documents were real. But basic logic, minimum due diligence shows that they aren't.

>>13990