>>1762
I don't really want to talk about the things happening "out there" because it will either sound insane or it will scary those who believe it. I didn't want to think about the possibility that aside from the microcosmic universe having to be replaced, the earth being replaced, that also galaxies would be destroyed at one point. It's not that the being dies, but rather the construct they were maintaining expires. This means the (meta)physical structure we see out there, the movements of stars and planets. What the fuck will happen if all of that is found to be rotten and most of it discarded? What a mess.
But the galaxies (beings) take it very casually, they just leave and let someone else pick up and create a new one, or they leave and let it decay down to nothing. They don't care at all.

This is, I realize now, why I saw lyrans as "the one and only most powerful race" out there. They managed to build themselves up to bodhisattva level using their Lyranet AI system and cybernetic bodies made from nanobots, so they can live on even if galaxies themselves collapse. Someone added the thought in my mind that
>some of them are already higher gods
implying that their technology has completely transcended regular lives and can be used to create entirely new galaxies, planets, races and species. Calling them "creator gods" as some people do is starting to make sense.