>>5690
interesting, so essentially they act to destroy whatever you're doing but can only do that because if they fail you'd benefit from it?

>sometimes there are innocent beings at the back of it.
how do you make the distinction?

I need to work on discerning things better i guess.

>>5691
It's tempting but I'd rather wait to develop my own interface before i make use of it, i tend to not trust the ramification of not doing my own work.