>>88149
you can't stop me

>>43161
>What can you tell me about the nature of creativity?
Ever heard about jungian cognitive functions? Creativity in terms of artistic expression is a product of introverted feeling (Fi) coupled with extroverted sensing (Se) for physical performance related art (painting, music, dance etc) and introverted sensing (Si) for writing and maybe some other things like directing (for comedic/sf type of writing it's Ti+Si e.g. Terry Pratchett, an INTP). Extroverted feeling (Fe) can work too I guess as long as it's high enough in the cognitive function stack but if we're talking that real artsy, ephemeral stuff then Fi is the king.
So if you want to become more creative find out your cognitive functions of your ego (MBTI tests are extremely faulty but they give some reference point from which you can start to figure out which type suits you best - read descriptions of different personalities and if you can't still decide which is more you then delve into the functions and differences between them which will eliminate one type or the other) and then look up what are your other 3 other personalities you can have potential access to (look up '4 sides of mind') and try to work out what forms of creativity you're geared towards and how to get there.
For example: you have Fi inferior? Does that mean you're shit out of luck? Initially you'll suck but with practice inferior function can become a hero leading to an aspirational personality. I haven't seen one agreed upon system of naming but aspirational form has the weakest function on top of the stack so it's ego upside down (should be a no brainer but don't date those who have it in the ego), anima/mirror/shadow/unconscious(or subconscious? I keep fumbling over which is which) is the polar reversal of ego (might seem tempting but the way they lead their lives is incompatible with yours so don't date those either) which means introverted functions become extroverted functions but don't change their position in the stack, and super ego the most difficult to access peacefully, is anima upside down (might seem like what you really want in a partner but they won't understand you at all - your other half which is is 50% your ego and 50% super ego - just switch the T and F letters of your MBTI type, people say ideal matches don't exist but they're retarded; individuals aren't ideal so even the perfect design might not work but that shouldn't stop you from attempting to build from the perfect design if you're going to attempt anything). To access super ego in it's positive form you need to either go through a most traumatic experience for your ego (getting hit right where it emotionally hurts but understanding that spreading more misery isn't the right thing) or master/integrate your anima and aspirational personalities, which is where your suppressed/shameful needs, feelings, wishes, thoughts and so on lie buried within. I didn't do that so I don't know how that works, I went in straight through the trauma but that can easily backfire if you don't have strong enough integrity. Anyway regardless of creativity gain unlocking all of your personalities is a worthwhile goal because it's the definition of emotional maturity.

>>12721
Here's one on functions themselves by the OG Jung himself but he's hard to read.

If you don't mind more digestible info there's a dude on youtube, C.S. Joseph, who's actually very competent in explaining the intricacies of functions and types (can't really recommend his other videos though), you just have to filter what he's saying through what he says about the other similar types if he's being too negative or positive. For example that he's now married to ESTP so he idolizes the type and won't speak ill about it (ESTP is THE bully type in it's corrupted and immature form) while at the same time bashing INFJ to hell and back since he's had a long and hurtful history with them. Anyway just serves to prove that the types that are hailed as the best for each other (N and S in the same position in the stack but reversed polarity) are anything but. You see intuition and sensing predicate individual's lifestyle and you cannot share life with someone that's lifestyle doesn't match yours or you're forcing yourself to not be yourself and that's a ticking time bomb. C.S. Joseph and many others claim that you need to have the polar opposites since they're also responsible for sexual attraction, at least the mental component, but it's better when the magnetism is between anima/animus and ego not ego - ego. Unfortunately most stories about true love have jungian idea - anima in the ego of your partner (like Okabe and Kurisu) but the attraction is so strong it's difficult to let your anima out since that leaves you with null attraction unless your partner switches with you. It's good for fiction because it's volatile and passionate but Jung was in the wrong here. Been there done that, got burned hard, also my parents are the perfect pair according to Jung and I see them tormenting one another as years go by because of lifestyle/needs differences.

Sorry, I know you're asking about the creativity itself mainly but the relationship thing is more important knowledge and barely anyone realized that so far. And yet romantic relationship with your F/T counterpart is like joining two hemispheres of the same brain, everything works so smoothly as long as people put in minimal effort. Love language is the same, weaknesses are covered, growth naturally facilitated, fears and emotional needs adressed, follower/leader roles are obvious and don't cause dissatisfaction, every sexual need is realized through interactions between different depths of personalities and when you're on the same level you have emotional closeness so there's no situation of switching into undesirable or redundant set of functions - every configuration works. Getting this through to people would eliminate so many problems and pain, seriously. Also this is why the most frequent of types in men are ISTJ while in women those are ISFJ and the least frequent are INFJ for men and INTJ for women. The tendency is visible for other types too but it's less clear but that might be because of too small of a sample size or mistyping.

>>62065
Hello me

>>14904
so it's kind of working but instead of 500's I get 404's

>>37198

I wonder if she is pregnant.

>>53165
>What can you tell me about the nature of creativity?
Ever heard about jungian cognitive functions? Creativity in terms of artistic expression is a product of introverted feeling (Fi) coupled with extroverted sensing (Se) for physical performance related art (painting, music, dance etc) and introverted sensing (Si) for writing and maybe some other things like directing (for comedic/sf type of writing it's Ti+Si e.g. Terry Pratchett, an INTP). Extroverted feeling (Fe) can work too I guess as long as it's high enough in the cognitive function stack but if we're talking that real artsy, ephemeral stuff then Fi is the king.
So if you want to become more creative find out your cognitive functions of your ego (MBTI tests are extremely faulty but they give some reference point from which you can start to figure out which type suits you best - read descriptions of different personalities and if you can't still decide which is more you then delve into the functions and differences between them which will eliminate one type or the other) and then look up what are your other 3 other personalities you can have potential access to (look up '4 sides of mind') and try to work out what forms of creativity you're geared towards and how to get there.
For example: you have Fi inferior? Does that mean you're shit out of luck? Initially you'll suck but with practice inferior function can become a hero leading to an aspirational personality. I haven't seen one agreed upon system of naming but aspirational form has the weakest function on top of the stack so it's ego upside down (should be a no brainer but don't date those who have it in the ego), anima/mirror/shadow/unconscious(or subconscious? I keep fumbling over which is which) is the polar reversal of ego (might seem tempting but the way they lead their lives is incompatible with yours so don't date those either) which means introverted functions become extroverted functions but don't change their position in the stack, and super ego the most difficult to access peacefully, is anima upside down (might seem like what you really want in a partner but they won't understand you at all - your other half which is is 50% your ego and 50% super ego - just switch the T and F letters of your MBTI type, people say ideal matches don't exist but they're retarded; individuals aren't ideal so even the perfect design might not work but that shouldn't stop you from attempting to build from the perfect design if you're going to attempt anything). To access super ego in it's positive form you need to either go through a most traumatic experience for your ego (getting hit right where it emotionally hurts but understanding that spreading more misery isn't the right thing) or master/integrate your anima and aspirational personalities, which is where your suppressed/shameful needs, feelings, wishes, thoughts and so on lie buried within. I didn't do that so I don't know how that works, I went in straight through the trauma but that can easily backfire if you don't have strong enough integrity. Anyway regardless of creativity gain unlocking all of your personalities is a worthwhile goal because it's the definition of emotional maturity.

>>12409
*bzzzzzt*
wrong answer
It was in fact nazis that came up with die Neuordnung (Europas) which unmistakably echoes the illuminati seal on the one dollar bill (novus ordo seclorum), now that's a coincidence.
Have you read "Mein Kapf"? there's a bit there in which Hitler muses on how Ancient Ayyrians are the originators of civilization and likened them to Prometheus - and Prometheus is synonymous with Lucifer so like just wow, another sheer coincidence, could you imagine?
Did you know that swastika is a solar symbol btw? And sun aka morning star (some also say morning star is venus and there's a trail to follow there too but sun is just as valid) is a symbol for illumination/Lucifer? nah, surely a coincidence as well.
What about Schwarze Sonne? Like the one in Himlers Wewelsburg castle where he conducted orgiastic sex magic rituals like Aleister Crowley? Did you know that Freemasons are big into the black sun concept which gives illumination with it's invisible light? Just so happens to be a mere chance.
Don't question anything! Simply look at the nose! And, most of all, always remember - anyone that tries to steer you away from glorious party ideology is, without a shadow of a doubt, a jew.

>>89490
you think?

>>63373
umm excuse me that was my Cirno please find one for yourself to post

>>7396
guess I'll have to crop it anyway since it didn't go through (it was over 30000 pixels in height after all)