>>19440
They pop up a few times a week in /bbg/. A possible solution over there, where new threads are not created that often, would be if new threads could be held for release for say 24hrs. Give the BO two options - release or delete CP Spam.

>>19440
You refer to that Asian dude ofc. I do not know if he is under 18 or not. I won't stare his photos to decide or start an investigation. We delete them because it's spam anyway.
As for the "regular" cp spam mentioned here: >>19441, it gets posted several days a week, several times on those days. We delete them continuously. I have to note this is ongoing for at least 5 years now, and it happens on multiple imageboards not just on Endchan. So in relation to this part:
>The FBI has been alerted
I can safely say the FBI does not give a fuck, or worse, they are the ones doing it - as we could learn it from the news (remember the occasion when they took over a service distributing cp spam and instead of shutting it down they made it more efficient in the hope to catch pedos - well at least I'm hoping they did it for this reason and not to incriminate innocents).
In case you wrote that line to threaten us with the FBI, I have to remind you that according to:
- 47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material
- read it here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
platform providers are not liable for the content uploaded by the users of the platforms.
>I also think these spammers should have their IP ranges BLOCKED
>Perhaps maybe Tor to
These two are either naive suggestions or outright malicious. Attackers can switch IPs (and with them ranges they post from) very easily. If we were following the suggestions this would result in blocking ranges from legitimate user traffic. Same with Tor, but blocking Tor also means blocking users who want to avoid their home countries' regimes' who want to censor their internet access.
So these are the two avenues. You might be a good willed but naive poster, or you are yourself the attacker who want us to isolate the site from legitimate users.
Also stop fearmongering.

The CP spammer is back with vengeance spamming up /b/ tonight. I bumped a couple of regular threads and contacted the feds about it. I'm not trying to get the site shut down, I just want this pathetic criminal loser to be put on notice.

>>19513
Thanks. Deleted the Natalie Portman fakes thread. If there was any other it was gone.

WrongThink

Yikes, so much CP on both sites, with short bans if ever.
Yet certain BOs giving 5 year range bans for normal YouTube links...

>>19538

Correct, Child Porn is a 1-2 day ban, while YouTube links of weather and current news is a 5 year ban, no appeal accepted.

>>19538
>>19543
False comparison. The "youtube ban" was not issued by the global team.

As for the short ban of the csam:
It is useless to ban long term, because no matter if we ban or not, next occasion the spammer uses a different IP. But on one go he could post on 8-12 boards, and if caught in the act with a ban he can be stopped for that round. Why let him post 8-12 times, when can be reduced to 1-3?
The IPs the spammer uses are discardable for him, which means either Tor on clearnet address, proxies, or VPNs. All can be used by other people than the spammer. So issuing a long ban on them would block innocent people from posting.

>>19544
Yea, it's totally not possible to log in and out of global mod accounts and switch to a board owner account, or have multiple board members who are also global mods, etc... "Many such cases."
Also as you pointed out: VPNs; making Any long term range ban useless and only "block innocent people from posting" until they use a VPN or other....
Expect Us

>>19545
>it's totally not possible to log in and out of global mod accounts and switch to a board owner account
This is really a great topic for you because despite I can tell you the facts that:
1. I am not the BO of that particular board or any other that you use;
2. I do not have a second account;
3. I do not know if any of the global staff has alternative accounts - used or not as BO account of any board;
and you can always say I'm lying, and sweep everything off the table. I can't give evidence on something that does not exists - but to be frank the burden of proof is on you.
And you have nothing but this malicious idea, an accusation which basis only exists in your mind. But you can spread it, creating only suspicion, denigrating our character. So, so typical.
What will be next? Demanding us to de-anonymize ourselves? Check everyone for hidden accounts?
Let's go into the hypothetical:
What if a global is a BO of too? What if he sees an issue on the board where he is BO, and decides he won't ban on global level, won't ban the user from the whole site, but on local, and only on the board? How unjust!! Right? Do you want all the bans to be global? It would make my job here easier since you could not post, and won't need to continue this pointless conversation.

>>19546
Check reports.

>>>/agatha2/106383 >>>/agatha2/97056 >>>/agatha2/96846 CP
>>>/agatha2/112391 her doxx coordinates

>>>/agatha2/106144 >>>/agatha2/105814 >>>/agatha2/110140 CP

>>>/agatha2/107302 the nipple is slightly censored, but she's basically naked and she's underage. I'd delete that too

>>>/agatha2/78068 >>>/agatha2/80090 >>>/agatha2/76382 CP

>>>/agatha2/17343 and all the other nudes in that thread are u18. She recently posted her id on r9k.

Also check every single Ciara thread. She was underage in 95% of her nudes. If she looks healthy and not a heroin addicted skeleton, then it's u18.

There's probably more, but I don't recognize all the girls posted there. By the way the "Vamp" girl is underage and posting sexy bikini pics for people requesting child pornography of her >>>/agatha/108290 .I don't think this behavior should be tolerated.

>>19694 (me)
Also this mega link >>>/agatha2/108219 has CP in it

>>19694
We took a look at them, evaluated, and did some deletions, thanks.
>requesting
>I don't think this behavior should be tolerated.
How do you make difference between trolling, jokes, parody, irony, etc., and the real deal?
Would you censor on principle all the trolling, jokes, parody, irony, etc. in case they are the real deal?

>>19694
>>19695
All lies. Clearly a seether with a vendetta against the board making shit up to try to cause problems. Probably Delastelle.

>>19700
Hello, sorry for being pedantic but you didn't thoroughly clean the board.

Here >>>/agatha2/106383 you purged the pics but not the mega. It links to the same child pornography you deleted and much more. They are all extremely old pics and she was underage at the time.

This mega link >>>/agatha2/108219 should also be purged. In the zip there are nudes of a 13yo, 2 15yos, a 16yo and a known 17yo camwhore whose threads get regularly deleted on 4chan. Possibly more.

In the previous post I forgot to mention this >>>/agatha2/79670 . It links to cp. Sunny/Kaya was 13-14 in those pics and in the photo attached to the post.

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/79110384/#79111367 here Vultz posted her id. She said that she was underage in all these pics >>>/agatha2/17343 from 2022

You should also check ciara's threads more carefully. Most of her pornography was produced when she was underage. For instance, it's known that in the reddit peeing videos >>>/agatha2/79531 she was 15 and there's proof of it in the same thread. Also these are 100% u18 >>>/agatha2/75572 >>>/agatha2/75992 >>>/agatha2/79506 (hint: she was underage in all the pics with that watermark). I haven't checked the other ciara threads. I'll leave that to you and the moderation team.

Regarding the vamp girl, I don't think it's trolling. She really sent child pornography of herself and some of it ended up being posted on the board. Ever since then, people keep asking her and her groomer to post more. It's a bit disturbing especially because she engages with them >>>/agatha2/108290 . I wouldn't let this fly, but you do you.

Cheers

>>19705
Men should marry little girls.
Each man should have his own personal child bride.

The world should end otherwise in WW3

>>19705
>her and her groomer to post more.
It's called bride and groom you piece of shit.

>NO, OUR JESUS SAYS BETTER A MILLSTONE AND CHOP OFF YOUR DICK FOR HEAVEN
Your Jesus is not God.
The actual God allows men to have female children as brides. You don't know it because you cannot read the languages his law was recorded in.

WW3 is here. YOU are going to die. Your Jesus' law is going to end. Your white feminist beliefs will die with you.

>>19705
Thanks, we're gonna look into it.
>mega
That content isn't hosted at us. If you are aware mega host illegal content you should contact them and ask them to take it down.
I don't know about that other site if they'd care.

>>19755
Role signature for validation.