/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events.

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Board Rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Magrathea | Catalog | Bottom


Please use the stickies + catalog
DO NOT CONTINUE UNTIL YOU HAVE READ META THREAD 6
Logs can be found here: https://endchan.org/logs.js
Insulting National Socialism or Hitler or promoting jews will be banned immediately.

Expand All Images


(10.90 KB 257x196 download.jpg)
Landed-Labor Creates Value Anonymous 11/14/2023 (Tue) 18:32 Id: f98032 [Preview] No. 91634
as marx said, labor creates value but what creates labor? Nature does. The body and genes, being a part of nature, and the one most related to us, is along with land, the main source of value. Ergo, it's really landed property, and landed economies i.e. natipnalist economies, which produce value contra marx.


Anonymous 11/14/2023 (Tue) 18:36 Id: f98032 [Preview] No.91635 del
>>91634
sorry for typos, it should be: "nationalist"


Anonymous 11/16/2023 (Thu) 03:54 Id: 29ab70 [Preview] No.91646 del
Nationalist economies value race. Racial singularity is the value because it preserves tradition, experience, culture. Racial pluralism is the loss of value with the loss of tradition, experience and culture. Value has nothing to do with ownership unless that owned item produces something of benefit. Owned land, as long as it isn't either cultivated for flora and harvested or used to raise fauna, is pointless.

Wealthy idiots with many acres of land and only threats of murder in case of trespass accomplish no value nor benefit. There's the flaw in your post. It's too low effort.


Anonymous 11/18/2023 (Sat) 17:44 Id: f47f54 [Preview] No.91685 del
>>91646
one can think of the body, genes, the blood -the race -as movable land and so both produce value.

Yes, land which is used simply as a speculative object is no longer really "land" but an instrument of finance, like bonds etc.

(even then I suppose that it could be one of the most lucrative such instruments, making the biggest contribution to revenues)

You can't compare that to say, an aristocrat who is essentially no different than an average farmer.

My point: the economics of our movement should be about liberating the rural classes and est. a rural-centric state. In the long run such a state built unwavering upon nature will be the most prosperous.


Anonymous 11/19/2023 (Sun) 11:49 Id: 29ab70 [Preview] No.91690 del
>>91685
>You can't compare that to say, an aristocrat who is essentially no different than an average farmer.
Farmers produce actual value. Aristocrats never experience a day of work in their lives.
>the economics of our movement should be about liberating the rural classes and est. a rural-centric state
Liberation must be from jewish economics, ZOG control. Otherwise the economy is only going to be an endless pit of debt and inflation over prosperity. We'll see how many eyes are opened after this latest Israeli government stunt of mass murders.


Anonymous 11/19/2023 (Sun) 20:49 Id: d4690f [Preview] No.91693 del
>>91690
>Aristocrats never experience a day of work
Aristocrats clearly produce value: provide protection, patronage for artisans, land-improvements, etc. The idea that aristocrats are useless actually helped jews eliminate nobles, and then oppress the peasantry and usher in debt-capital and debt-slavery. (not saying you are supporting judaism or jewry)
>liberation must be from jewish economics
yeah, ruralism does this by limiting the extent of usury, consumerism, the excesses of urbanism; and by supporting the organization of local unity and community. It's why ZOG obviously hates farmers and rural people.


Anonymous 11/20/2023 (Mon) 03:29 Id: 29ab70 [Preview] No.91695 del
>>91693
Kikes mainly assassinated aristocrats and also became aristocrats in the laziest sense. They oppressed the peasantry by assuming that form. The aristocrats themselves did not protect. Patronage came from taxes. Land improvements came from labor (and again, not by aristocrats). Pic related. Just an except from the entire speech on that date.


Anonymous 11/23/2023 (Thu) 04:06 Id: 5f5a2a [Preview] No.91707 del
>>91695
>They oppressed the peasantry by assuming that form
Wasnt also a thing in medival Paris a thing where jews managed thanks by undiscriminated priviledges to lend with interest to own almost everything and on purpouse kept citizens as perpetual serfs in polish lithuanian commonwealth?


Anonymous 11/23/2023 (Thu) 10:24 Id: 29ab70 [Preview] No.91708 del
(60.91 KB 800x450 Alex-Linder-Quote.jpg)
(642.63 KB 608x486 unnamed.png)
(91.03 KB 607x304 gasparro1.jpg)
>>91707
It's a sad fact I live in ZOG USA where English history on jews in the middle ages that I keep finding is constantly by (((Norman Golb))). Surprise. He claims atrocities against jews. Which just seems typical of their favorite lies throughout history. He gives a quote which when searched for, does not exist anywhere else. Attributed to "they" when talking about Crusaders. No individual.

"We want to attack the enemies of God in the east after traveling great distances, while before our eyes are the Jews, of all races God's greatest enemy."

The fact that quote originates from one jew, thus it's impossible for him to be telling the truth, may not be obvious to the average NPC. Most jews confess the truth as they're lying by denying their guilt. (((Norman Golb))) states that jews were frequently exiled and executed due to being "accused of" ritual murder. Which of course means kikes really committed ritual murders.



Top | Catalog | Post a reply | Magrathea | Return