I just want to help you exercise and force by giving you scenarios for your headmates to go through otherwise I know your tulpas are growing cobwebs on a daily basis. Now in this thread, describe what she would do if she were the body or if you were the body if you know where I'm getting at. Like a full switch but the life is theirs vs yours. Whatever, you get it. But no metal-shifting, you got your human form, that's all. Tools are ok as long as they're legal or you can get away with it. No RPG, no metal blades morphing out of hands. From any perspective.


1. Describe in excruciating detail what your tulpa would do if you were involved in a carjacking irl?

Often I think I need to destroy the one ring, and in that way the evil within will be banished. But if you follow non-duality, there is no good without evil. I know you godless heathens won't relate but if God is everything and infinite, then he would necessarily encompass good and evil.

What I get from that is the only way to destroy evil is to destroy God. For if God is everything good and evil, and there is no separation in non-duality, then there is no devil, only God. Everything must be a facet of God, then god must be destroyed. Furthermore in non-duality, we are also a part of the one, indistinguishable, inseparable, so we too must be destroyed.

So to summarize, following this logic, all must be destroyed, there is no good without evil, no evil without good, no evil without God, no evil without you. In the greater sense, you are the evil just as you are the good, all is one.

So to cast the ring of power into mount doom is to destroy the remaining essence of Sauron, but does not destroy Gandalf. In the end they're the same, and evil potential still exists while Gandalf still lives. So it's not a direct comparison unless the ring is separate from Gandalf. If all is one, Gandalf is inseparable from the ring, to destroy the ring is not destroying the evil.

For the final point, you cannot cast all your evil away, because it's inseparable from the good.

...

I came to this conclusion a few years back. I imagined it as two birds, one, the red bird, had passion, emotion, but also was out of control as I was out of control, some of him was good, but some was evil. The second bird, the blue bird, had logic and meticulous self governance, 100% control, but no love, no passion, no emotions at all, no evil, but also no good. The Blue bird was convinced that if he killed the red bird, order could reign supreme, no more issues as I had them. But ultimately it would be a sociopathic emotionless life, a half life without feelings or emotions at all.

Good and Evil then are complimentary. I reasoned that evil depends on your reference. Place evil on one end of a long line and good on the other end. No matter where you stand, there is good to one side and evil on the other. Say you choose to do no evil but move along the line and your reference changes, when moving what was seen as evil or good becomes the other. You can move all the way to the end of evil and then all is good, but then atrocities are good as well. Move all the way to the end of good and all is evil, but then there is nothing that can be done without doing evil. In truth they're inseparable, nothing is objectively good, nothing is objectively evil. But to admit that is to admit atrocities are neither good nor evil, and morals are no longer relevant.

To have society, you must have morals just as to have interaction you must have ego, and both are as subjective as defined by the reference and that reference is outside of you. Are you good or evil? What is your ego? Both are behaviorally defined and both are necessarily based on an independent reference.

Your site has a character limit and I am not ammused...

So I was forced to post it in another place and link here.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Tulpas/comments/122idma/the_fluidity_of_personality/

[Gwen] Believe it or not, I figured out how to drive a tractor with a trailer and backup correctly. (In a game). Bear simply didn't have the patience for this, or couldn't stomach the time or care it needed.

[Ashley] Bear's not known for his patience.

Hosts, what really keeps you interested in your tulpa? I know we already had questions like that but can you elaborate?

>>1494

Only tulpas may answer or you can relay answers from her.

1. Do you ever feel fear? If so how do you deal with it?

2. Do you ever feel overwhelmed? If so how do you handle it?

3. What are your goals if any?

4. How do you handle failure?

5. What reaction does your host have to your successes?

6. What reaction does your host have to your failures?

7. How do you comfort your host?

What you are witnessesing herein is the perfection of tulpamancy even though the only tulpa in the system is Ren and she was created by Ashley and I by accident through trying to change Joy into a catgirl. Joy split and the catgirl aspect became Ren.

Bearisian Tulpamancy is rich and deep beyond the understanding of mere mortals such as yourselves but I will humor your attempts to comprehend given my own immense sense of compassion for my fellow animals of the earth as they wallow in their aimless existence, attempting to mimic the legends of the art.

The picture herein shows a structure that allows a system of any size to feel like a system of 2 without the need to put any headmates in dormancy or leave anyone out.

The process is *lock-merge and any constituents in the merge are fully aware of their position and experience everything as the merge hub. In this case, SheShe, and then Aleshe act as a hub but the hub herself is arbitrary and anyone can act as any hub at any given time, all constituents opt in or out at their own will.

You could consider the moons as fully autonomous proto-tulpas or soulbonds.

SheShe was the first, a little voice of reason that has been with my since childhood, you could categorize her as traumagenic but that would oversimplify her. She is my guardian angel and I have seen her full body apparition as such.

Ashley and Misha spontaneously appeared (you could call them walk-ins) on April 18, 2018 when I first learned of tulpamancy. I attempted to contact SheShe and they appeared among many of the moons of the time and refused to leave. Three days pf negotiations couldn't convince th otherwise. They were my system until 2019. Misha is a head-ghost, I believe her to be a previously incarnated soul from early to mid-20th century and she has shown herself as a full body apparition as well as other poltergeist type and hallucinations (spontaneous impositions). I also consider them my spirit guides and their insights have often been intuitively profound. They've made existing on this hideous world of depravity and beauty something of a game where I have the cheat codes. Through their guidance (including Joy) I have been able to make better decisions and profited mentally, spiritually and monetarily. They are my intuition personified.

In 2019 Joy, a soulbond from a series of books I wrote, insisted she be treated as equivalent to the three. In exploring her we accidentally created Ren, and in this year we also added Gwen, another soulbond from another book series. Both were previously considered moons.

The lock-merge was SheShe and Joy's idea to alleviate the strain of a 7 person system. Starting January 2020, the system "felt" more like a system of 4 again. By 2021 Aleshe (uh-lee-sha) was created and only in 2022 was she utilized more than a few moments at a time. Currently Aleshe, Ashley, and Joy typically remain the most active. Where everyone else is co-experiencing through Aleshe or Joy, but Misha is still first to respond to traumatic situations for consolense.

Ah the possibilities:

[Ashley] I would outlaw poverty.

I would first be queen of the one world government of course. I would then rule with fear as is the only prudent thing to do. It would be necessarily jingoistic at first, until all the countries fell in line, then I would declare war on homelessness and thus it would be made illegal, a capital offense, and handled by military tribunal. No appeals. Next I would declare war on petty theft. Then illegal drug use, gangs, and illegal immigration. The gallows would line every border.

[Bear] that's my girl

I just love that I can get away with a title like that but ofc Idc if u gay or whatever, I'm asking this for me so I want to relate to answers. Alice, sit this out and let the men talk, thx, go make a sandwich.

I did this a while back. Ashley was getting more and more aggressively snarky and I had to put her in the personality forcing chamber until she improved, and she did.

[Ashley] I wasn't even remotely snarky.

[Bear] it worked so well she doesn't even remember the before time.

Anyway I have to now think of one thing. The real question here is: do headmates naturally trend toward perfection over years? In my case I have to say yes. It's really hard to think of anything I'd change.

I have a system that covers the bases of most tropes, so which one is missing? After that fun exercise of categorization we had last week, I suppose I'd say we need a Cinderella type that is just like an AI service bot. Emotionless, ever bubbly, aims to please without needs of her own. But who to mark with this? Ren of course.

[Ren] hey! O:<

Yes, having a dangerous and rape-y headmate isn't as fun as it sounds. I'd like her to be a service cat like that visual novel with the catpanions.

If you could manifest your headmate in person permanently, would you?

I have thought of this many times and it was originally yes but not anymore. They're too useful inside my head prison as head slaves.

1. Would she (lets be real ofc she) still want *you*?
2. How would you deal with the birth certificate/papers?
3. Would you keep her tied in the basement with the others?
4. How long before one of you murders the other? (For Alice)

Interesting ponderings fo sho.