N crying so much right now

BO, if you're gonna allow doxing you might as well allow posting cp, and wipe your ass with your fucking general rules

>>1284
those two things aren't really the same at all

>>1286
are you dumb? the point is that they're both illegal

>>1287
sharing publicly available info isn't illegal

>>1287
? revealing someones name isn't illegal. that's not even what doxxing is. no one posted her address

>>1288
>>1289
don't play dumb. you know perfectly that such info can easily lead to stalking and considerable harm to the people involved, you just don't care about it.

>>1290
and once again you're typing just like hesper :)

>>1291
I'm not her, you idiot. if you think you can tell who someone is from a couple of sentences it only goes to show how obsessed you are.
I hate your guts for what you people have done to her and other girls like her. you're a bunch of callous hypocrites, and nothing of what could happen to you would ever be too much as far as I'm concerned.
I wish you all the worst.

>>1292
i'd be on your side if you were talking about any other girl. hespie collects child porn and stalks women herself. shes part of the problem

>>1284
I try to be as hands-off as possible and not get involved in these things, so I know nothing about this.
If there are rule-breaking posts the best way to handle that would be to make a proper report.
I haven't received any reports of doxing lately. The only recent report was closed for having no reason given.
Thank you for your understanding.

What ever happened to Pammy?

>>1635
he tried posting here but the fag bo banned him

>>1710
when was this? banned him for what?

the absolute STATE of this board

the lily and kennedi threads are almost entirely just one guy who is very unhealthy. i know where i am and to not moralize about health here but he genuinely shouldn't be enabled and he makes the rest of the board look even worse

>>2546
you are mentally ill and unhappy. LOL

>>2521
the lily and ken threads?

>>2521
the rest of the board.

>>2521
who is he?

he's back at it

Thread-wise IDs have been enabled for the time being. We'll see how it goes.

this board really needs to be SHILLED more or something. I know there are way more orbiters than this, this place shouldn't be this dead

>>3012
8chan /agatha2/ was more active than the original /agatha/ though. It had more than double the number of posts. So I don't think it has anything to do with Franz.

>>3183
Double the posts and a quater of the content
It just became some r9k circle jerk

Why is the Marky thread at the bottom of the first page even though its last posts are more recent than threads above it? There are two threads that haven't been bumped in over a week above it. The Marky thread was bumped just yesterday. And why are there captchas now? Did something happen? very fishy.

>>4294
Yes, there was quite a bit of spam recently, which is why captchas have been enabled. Those threads are above others with more recent posts because they were bumped with spam that has since been deleted.

>>4295
It's interesting someone got defensive and said forbidden has never been an issue here, yet it's been spammed here this week, along with forbidden of both Sunny and Ciara. Again, feels very fishy.

>>4296
What's fishy is that someone (read: you) has repeatedly been making false claims about certain content posted here, and shortly subsequent to that the board is spammed with actual forbidden. That's what's fishy.

>>4535
Who is this random commie roastie did she ever even go on r9k

>>4535
Who this? Looks like a Jew

Mass necrobumping old threads with low effort posts will result in a ban.

By default a board can "hold" 15 pages worth of threads, so despite with bumping the fresh threads can end up at the end of the catalog, it needs some effort to bump them down.
I suggest enabling the "Hourly thread limit" feature, just write a number there. (Don't mistake it with the "Thread limit" feature!), if necessary.

>>5955
Thanks, hourly thread limit is enabled. They won't be able to do any real damage, it's just a minor annoyance.

Why is the max file size 5 KB?

>>6356
Due to spam.

i tried to add a new thread and included a jpg file but it says i need to include a file.

>>7545
Haven't encountered this problem before, try on one of the other domains (.gg, .org, .net)
If it still doesn't work let me know.

argentinian posted forbidden in the sunny thread

>>7872
All I see is a dead link.

Where do people go to talk about Rose (randytaylor69) these days? I used to hang out at rose and roze at 8chan but these days besides /r/fansofrose (which censors everything too much) I feel lost.

How much samefagging is actually going on in the empath chan thread?

>>9633
Took a quick look through and I don't see any samefagging in that thread.

who is she and why does she keep inviting me to her server and sending me scary pictures

>>10079
?

>>7968
https://endchan.net/roze/

also https://vk.com/rozie has a discord.

I see a lot of people on 4chan post pictures of e girls, some newfags even making threads asking who they are.

Something is happening, I didn't see these type of post months ago, and I used the board a lot, now it's one of the first things i see going on r9k or b.

I think were going back, back to the e girl era, back to the orbiting, MAYBE THIS AINT THE END, MAYBE WELL GET NEW ATTENTION WHORES, HAHAHAHHAHAHAH

>>11610
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://8ch.net/agatha2*
Never forget what they took from us

>>11635
i wanna go back

>>11600
You can thank that new server "Marc's E-Harem" for the most recent uptick in viral 4chan related e-drama
that place basically became the new sheepvillage overnight and apparently the newfag admin stepped down and left discord because all the drama flooding in was driving him insane

Whoever the admin of this board is better answer the reports or he will be hearing from our legal team.

>>11945
Most reports here are going to be dismissed because this website's rules are lax. The BO is Sosa. His discord tag is jvmvicv#1830 and he's an admin of Marc's E-Harem.

>>11945
Zero reports in the queue.

>>27
>-No doxxing
Does this count?
>>11893

>>12018
This is spam that I missed. Deleted now. It would be helpful if people would use the report system for things like this, it makes it easier to clean.
>>11946
I wasn't going to bother to address this, but, just for the record, he isn't the board owner. I don't know what lead you to believe this but it isn't the case.

>>12020
on discord he referenced BO posts made here then deflected when it was asked who the BO was and jokingly said Ciara owned it, and others said it was Michael. he also owned the last 8chan boards before the site went down

Deleted thread with photo of literal child.

Where can I email an admin

>>13037
You can contact me at this e-mail address, if necessary.

>>13038
What email address??

>>13094
click his name dumbass

BO, could you delete off-topic and less than 10 replies old threads. We already hit page 15. Older general that hit bump limit will be pruned soon. I know it's gonna happen anyway but at least it could be delayed for some time.

>>14026
Yes, I'll do some cleaning soon, thanks for reminding me.

Okay let's start from the beggining.

Who is egirls and how do you guys search for them on the internet? What's the point to discuss their regular photos/stoies etc? I don't get that tbh

>>15006
Most, but not all, of the girls posted about here are known from 4chan's /r9k/ board. Other "e-girls" are found on social media like Instagram, TikTok, etc. Anons come here to discuss and post about them for various reasons. Some simply like to look at cute girls, some are lonely fantasists, some think they will obtain relationships with them, some formerly had relationships with them. Others view these girls as characters in some sort of interactive drama that they can insert themselves into if they so wish, end enjoy discussing this as it plays out. Still others dislike or even hate these girls and come here to express that as well.

>>15053
Thank you for explaining this to me!

>>15006
It is basically lolcow.farm for men

>>15118
>lolcow.farm
god, what's this? never heard of it

She is underage in the photos that you requested, and I believe you know that, so I'm denying your appeal. I've already had to ban you multiple times in the past and you continue to do things I've told you not to. This was the last straw.

Please delete irrelevant e-celebs thread. They're filling up the board. They can post them on >>2211 thread

>>16569
This board is dead, let the children have their fun.

Pruned a bunch of threads.

I'll note here that, when you make a global report, those reports go to the global staff only and are not received by the staff of the board.
As content that does not break Endchan's global rules ( https://endchan.net/.static/globalRules.html ) is unlikely to be removed by the global mods, if there is an issue with something posted here the best way to go about attempting to resolve that would be by dealing directly with board staff.
As always your issues can be brought up here, by simply posting on the board itself; by using the non-global report system; or, by contacting board staff at the attached e-mail.
If contacting by e-mail you should notify here, if you want a response in under a month.
Thanks.

>>17129
Check email please

Deleted a thread because the girl looked way too young.

>>17183
Checked.

>>18322
some egirl doxxed her ex

>>18324
Cool.

>>18327
General rule
-No doxxing,

I sent in a report, how2delete?

>>18329
There are often doxxes posted on this board. I put that in the rules so that I can deny responsbility for this sort of thing, and so that I have justification for deleting things when I choose to do so at my own discretion. Doxxing isn't against the site rules and so, in general, I don't really care about it.
However, since in this case there is a specific address posted, and I don't particularly want that kind of thing here without a good reason for it, and I don't really know what this is about, I will remove this for now. But you should really be more circumspect about your online activities in the future, okay, Brandon?

>>18330
>>18330
Wb my dox thread? I’m innocent!

is RSS feed supported? it would be a very useful feature

Could Admin delete thread >>18299
Some trnny used pictures of a 15 yr old girl to catfish

>>20217
I'm not aware of anything like that but I'll look into it. I agree it would be useful.
>>20446
I don't understand what you're saying about this supposed catfishing. It's a thread with pictures of a girl and links to her accounts. I don't think she's 15 either. I'm going to leave it up for now.

News: Bump limit has been raised to 500 posts.
I think this is as high as it goes.

>>20217
It does seem there is an rss feed available at https://endchan.net/agatha2/index.rss
However, this feed appears to only give notifications for the creation of new threads. And also I can't get even that to work consistently. So, not very useful as it stands. But you can try it.
It would be nice if there was some way to get notifications for all posts made on the board, but I don't think there is any way to do that currently.

>>20711
that rss feed doesn't work. it says invalid rss feed.
I tried checking it with an rss validator https://validator.w3.org/feed/ and it seems having an invalid token or it's malformed.
A working index.rss would be quite helpful, it should notify if a new thread is created or an old one bumped I think.

>>21007
Yeah, I don't know much about it. I don't think there's any way for me personally as a board owner to fix that or set something like that up. You can try asking the endchan admins/devs about it on >>>/operate/ if you want, that's probably your best bet.

BO plz bring back captchas or something. im sick of seeing the cp spam

>>22453
Captcha is already required for thread creation. It's usually deleted fairly quickly but there's not much that can be done to prevent the spam altogether since it's posted from different IPs every time.

Please report the spam using the report system if you see it.

>>22455
sorry i forgot that captchas are required for thread creation. will try to do but anytime i see one of those posts i close my eyes and close the whole window because i don’t wanna see it. they usually get taken down quickly anyway though so thanks for that at least. can BOs disable posting with vpn?

>>22455
I don't know what tools the BO has, but can't you just create rules to autodelete or autoreport posts that respect certain patterns?The cp spammer always uses the same words, same pics and same links. It shouldn't be too difficult to set patterns to filter them out.

>>22453
>>22456
>>22528
We can't do much just delete ASAP. Quite often we manage to catch the spammer (spambot?) red handed, but sometimes the thing can sit on the boards for some hours. We do what we can, we ask patience. And ofc we ask to notify us, there is the report facility, and ofc IRC/Telegram/Discord, there just note the board where the cp was spotted, don't need to link it.
We could hashban images, but they just use a different one on next occasion.
We could ban strings, but they just rewrite the text, use different words, spell it differently or insert spaces or whatnot on the next occasion.
We have experience with perceptual hash banning tool (which is not available on endchan), but it isn't that great to be honest, and causes more problems.

>>22456
That's understandable, I don't like seeing it myself. They're removed as soon as we see them, but they're being posted every day lately, sometimes multiple times a day. Seems like we go through periods where we get consistent spam like this and then periods where it stops altogether. Hopefully it will let up soon.
There's no way for board owners to disable vpn-posting, no. I can disable posting through .onion but the spam isn't usually posted that way so it wouldn't make much difference. All that can really be done at this point is to ban and delete, but since they have access to an unknown number of IPs the banning doesn't have much effect.
>>22528
>can't you just create rules to autodelete or autoreport posts that respect certain patterns?
There is no way to do this with the tools at the disposal of board owners, which are very limited. I'll try banning the hashes of the images they post again, though when I've done that in in the past it hasn't stopped them as they just modify the images or use different ones.

>>22532
wtf, do you think that the spammers are targeting this specific board? it’s the only board i visit on here, so i wouldn’t know if the same spam gets posted across the site. but if you’re banning specific images hashes and they change up the photo to circumvent that so they can keep posting them, that seems very targeted.

>>22604
Nah, the spam gets posted on most of the top boards and on other altchans as well, so we're not being targeted.

>>22604
The specific spam (which has couple of versions) is posted on many chans (maybe on everywhere but not on 4chan because they block everything), and several boards on Endchan (not sure about other places, I guess the same situation).
It is done on couple of days a week. Sometimes there are longer gaps. A day they do it 1-4 times.
It's far from sure that there is any cp on the sites they link. I hope noone is stupid enough to open it.

Please delete the delusional posts and dox posts from the dumb roastie posting about me in the Seymour thread por favor

>>22994
I've removed the post that contained an address.

>>23052
K sweet thx

Wtf.

>>23668
Seems the board has been quite active lately. Averaging ~200 posts per day over the last week. Don't think anything like that's ever happened before.

do you all think the parasocial relationship with egirls is worth it or do you come out worse off in the long run

can mod remove this post with this discord tag: >>22725

>>23915
I've edited out the discord tag, but I'll leave the post up.

>>23915
I hope things get better for you.

This pedo is really angry lol

are mods unironically too stupid to realize that anybody can ban evade and that your job is literally worthless

Why is there so much discussion revolving around doxxing my gf allowed in her thread?
-Sosa

>>28460
I don't see much discussion related to doxxing in that thread, and what little there is doesn't really rise to the level of requiring moderative intervention in my view.

>>28479
Erm ok, well thank you for the reasonable and timely response
*tips my sombrero to you*

where can I send a DMCA takedown notice to on this board?

>>29314
what do you want taken down?

>>29317
i need the board owner's email address to send a DMCA takedown notice. the image links will be included in the takedown request. already sent one to the Ec admin

>>29318
the board e-mail is attached here: >>17129
make sure you include proof that you are the rightful copyright owner. fraudulent takedown requests may result in legal action.

>>29323
Don't ever do that again.

Come on mods, keep adding their image hashes to the filter list. It's like the third time that they use the same picture. Even if you can't stop them, you can make their life more difficult. Keep pushing back as much as possible and the CP spam will eventually reduce.

How come this board has no working [code] tags?
Fix this immediately (；￣Д￣)

>>30884
We're still banning hashes and filtering the links they post when we can, but it's faster to just delete it right away and we want to remove it as quickly as possible. Thanks for everyone's patience and unerstanding while we work at it.
>>31164
What is the need for code tags?

>>31254
Suggesting style improvements perhaps.
a. Right now every post with email is marked as sage (was it always like this?).
b. Sage is not a downboat, there is no need to be aggressively red with exclamation mark.
'''
.linkName:is([href="mailto:sage"],[href="mailto:Sage"],[href="mailto:SAGE"]):after {
content: "[SAGE]";
float: right;
color: green;
padding: 4px;
}
'''
This rule is not needed then:
'''
.noEmailName::after {
content: "";
}
'''

>>31453
>>31454
That is helpful, thanks. It's something I only added recently after seeing and liking it on another board. We used to have something similar on 8chan. I just copied the code they had; I saw the problem with it but couldn't figure out how to fix it with a cursory glance. I think I'll leave it red for now though as that's how it was on 8ch.

I've enabled the setting for code tags so you should be able to use them now.

>>31454
Red is better. At least people learn to sage.

>>31460
I went on to look into LynxChan's source code to see how sage input is treated. It uses toLowerCase() method of Javascript.
https://gitgud.io/InfinityNow/LynxChan/-/blob/master/src/be/engine/postingOps/post.js
And precisely, latest commit
https://gitgud.io/InfinityNow/LynxChan/-/commit/2d631fc342e93860c4e73662b0782184795565b7

var saged = (parameters.email && parameters.email.toLowerCase() === 'sage');

You can see how it works in browser console [F12]. Declare variable

let email = "sAGE"

Then

console.log(email.toLowerCase())

Should print lowercase

sage

To reassign it use this:

email = "sAge"

To cover all cases we'll then need to specify 2⁴=16 permutations of word sage since CSS does not support regular expressions (yet) :^)

.linkName:is([href="mailto:SAGE"],[href="mailto:SAGe"],[href="mailto:SAgE"],[href="mailto:SAge"],[href="mailto:SaGE"],[href="mailto:SaGe"],[href="mailto:SagE"],[href="mailto:Sage"],[href="mailto:sAGE"],[href="mailto:sAGe"],[href="mailto:sAgE"],[href="mailto:sAge"],[href="mailto:saGE"],[href="mailto:saGe"],[href="mailto:sagE"],[href="mailto:sage"]):after {

  content: "SAGE!";

  float: right;

  color: red;

  padding: 4px;

}

Fun fact: these rules don't work when you access site from cloudflare domains with JS disabled. Kohlchan, which runs on LynxChan fork has no email field at all and uses checkbox for sage, displays it as separate span

<span class="sage">SÄGE!</span>

>We used to have something similar on 8chan
Do you have a good snapshot of page with CSS to see how it looked? I checked archive links above and it doesn't look impressive, lots of shit broken. Besides, changing a couple of background colors is not that hard, I don't see a point if it still looks ugly.

I have some ideas in mind, mostly about fixing multiple images, text wrapping around them nicely and post/catalog widths first, borrowing some ideas from cool kids' chans like old Arisu:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210429092636/https://arisuchan.jp/cyb/
Russian neighbors have nice big readable fonts and no "Posting mode: Reply" #modeBanner div on page (something server-side?)
https://endchan.org/dobrochan/

What annoys me most is sticky header: every time you jump to post anchor, it overlaps top row, and I have tried everything, it doesn't fucking work? Like what the fuck. I barely know CSS better than you, few hours of reading tutorials. Here's what I tried:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4086107/fixed-page-header-overlaps-in-page-anchors
https://css-tricks.com/hash-tag-links-padding/
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10732690/offsetting-an-html-anchor-to-adjust-for-fixed-header

Now to my complaints about bold markup. This file has some answers:
https://gitgud.io/InfinityNow/LynxChan/-/blob/master/doc/Markdown.txt
>Observation: it will be run against individual lines of the message, not against the whole message at once.
They should definitely include this on help page.

Now let me test if this thing gobbles up language-specific syntax:
[code css]
#modeBanner {
display: none;
}

>>31480
Alright, I think I see how that works.

>Do you have a good snapshot of page with CSS to see how it looked? I checked archive links above and it doesn't look impressive, lots of shit broken. Besides, changing a couple of background colors is not that hard, I don't see a point if it still looks ugly.
I was just referring to the red 'SAGE!' (some examples here: https://archive.ph/dlYbU — if I recall correctly, this was a default option that could be toggled in the board's settings) not the old eye-rape css that this board had on 8ch. There was a nice css that Franz had on the first board for a while but I can't find any examples of that preserved online. Though 8chan's board software always looked cleaner than anything based on Lynx anyway, it would be hard to make anything here look that good.

I don't really have much time to put into it myself, nor the know-how, but if there are more suggestions of things to add to the css to improve it, we can implement them when we get the chance, so long as anons don't have any issues with anything.

>>31480
>specify 2⁴=16
Wouldn't that mean the max of 1000 posts in a thread would be 1600 operations?

>>31705
>1600
*16,000

>>31705
>>31706
16k sounds much, but pattern matching isn't something a modern computer/browser wouldn't do in a fraction of a second while loading the page. There are much more sinister ways to rape CPU with CSS. Actually, I looked some stuff up and improved the rule:

.linkName:not(.noEmailName)[href="mailto:sage" i]:after {

  content: "SAGE!";

  float: right;

  color: red;

  padding: 4px;

}

:not(.noEmailName)

excludes all emailless posts, and

i

makes sure "mailto:____" is compared case-insensitively to "mailto:sage" (I do not know and care not how xD). Certainly looks cleaner than the whole list I typed by hand generated before.

>>31700
I skimmed through archives and can't say there's anything worthwhile. Default vichan/infinity skin and cyan bg gray posts one. But that SAGE thing was neat wherever you picked it from. It's not that Lynx is bad technically, it mostly has an identical markup in html, it's just dev/admin is lazy to make it better looking default style, so you judge them based on this.

While I'm at it, should we make code blocks a tit more readable with this rule:

/*Style code segments*/

pre {

  font-size: initial;

  display: block;

  background: #ebf8ff;

  padding: 0.4em;

}

Hide pointless action links (from my point of view)

/*Hide [Preview] link in post header*/

.linkPreview {

    display: none;

}

/*Hide [Last 50 Posts] link*/

.linkLast50 {

  display: none;

}

Now here's something more fun. It displays post numbers within the thread to keep track of bump limits. I haven't been able to toggle it only for threads, so it displays nonsensical numbering on front page (not in catalog).

/*Count and display post number within a thread*/

.opCell {

  counter-reset: postnum;

}

.linkQuote:after {

  color: green;

  font-weight: bold;

  counter-increment: postnum 1;

  content: " #" counter(postnum);

}

Maybe it'd make more sense to display this number on the left, instead of default "Anonymous" screen name.

And finally a rule just to make fonts more readable:

body {

  font-size:  larger;

}

I'm practicing little by little, so maybe I'll shoot more of this stuff later. It feels therapeutic in a way, to learn these stuff, more therapeutic than I'd expected looking at pics of cute girls would be, which actually turned out very depressing ;_;

>>31781
Hey, code blocks can not be inlined inside sentences as mono-space text. Sad!

The 350 MB cap is per file or per post? For istance, can I upload 5 350MB files in one post (1750MB) ?

>>32063
Not really no. You'll struggle to upload one 350MB file, you have to disable JS too. I managed to upload 250+ MB files, one at a time. Perhaps would work with close to 350. Still it's insanely high.

>>32063
Usually it's total per post.
367,000,000 bytes according to >>29663

Here's a CSS rule to remind of this (text is non-selectable unfortunately):

#labelMaxFileSize:after {

    content: ' (367,000,000 Bytes)';

}

Disabling JS helps, but probably using something less complex and memory hungry than a browser to upload is even better.

[POST_MESSAGE]

Figured basic posting with curl, but still no file. Password string was sent successfully, but still can't delete post, weird. Lemme check again.

>>31781
I've added most of your changes, nice work, your contributions are appreciated. The Preview link is probably useless for most users but I do need that to remain on my part as I often make use of it so I've left that rule out. Maybe a few others use it as well. The post numbers thing is interesting, I think it's placement is alright, if you find a way to fix the numbering on the front page just let us know.

The font size change I'm not sure about. I've added this for now on a provisional basis, but, to me at least, it looks absolutely massive. Though that may be just because I'm not used to it. I think how optimal it is may depend on individual users differing setups as well. We'll see how it goes. If any anons want to give feedback on this, or any other changes, they are welcome and encouraged to do so. I'll leave it up to the users to decide.

Apologies for my late response, been away for a bit.

>>32089
User post deletion is currently disabled due to its potential for abuse, so you will not be able to delete posts even with the correct password. If there is a valid reason why you want a certain post deleted, such as accidental double-posts (mods will often pro-actively fix these if seen), mistaken/broken posts, things of that nature, you can make a report or can request here and mods will take care of it.

>>32205
Nice, the board is much cooler now.
The post number thing should be fixed or deactivated on the frontal page though.

>catalog shows 4 threads in a row instead of 5 in mobile view
It ruined the page counter (5x2 per page), bring it back

>>32214
isn't what page each thread is on shown in the catalog anyway?

>>32345
More of a UI problem. It made the UI too fucking big

Fug, we're running out of pages. Is 16 really the maximum? Could you set a higher bump limit if that is possible? Or, generally convince people not create new threads until old one is locked? It's not like they can't use catalog, often knowing what they came for, and 1000 posts is double the size of regular threads.

I see there's some dubious quality old stuff taking up valuable slots:
>>11921 >>11798 >>18020

By the way, what's the difference between >>17577 qt general and >>2211 misc e-girl thread? Could you merge their contents?

>>33424
16 is the maximum number of pages, can't be increased on my end. From what I've seen threads won't bump past 500 posts even if the limit is set higher, but I'll go ahead and do that.
With the rate they seem to be going, it may be best to hold off on making new Marky threads until they're nearer 1000 posts. I don't know if this would be ideal to do for all threads though, since it may create a situation where a bunch of the more active threads are off the first page for ~weeks at a time. Which, in addition to creating an added hassle for users who want to follow multiple threads or just to see any new posts on the board by making them enter into each individual thread through the catalog or to dig through the pages, it may make the board appear less active and it would also make moderation more difficult as all those threads being posted in still have to be monitored and now they wouldn't be bumped with any new posts. I think in most cases it is much preferable to have the more popular threads and threads being actively posted in on the first page.

I've gone through and deleted some old low-priority threads. I've been doing this periodically on an as-needed basis, but I neglected it for a while and it looks like a higher-priority thread was bumped off when an unanticipated number of threads were made in a short period. Of course, it's inevitable that those threads will be lost from the board eventually, but we'll try to hold that off as long as reasonably possible.

>>17577 and >>2211 are essentially the same thing, yes. There is no way that I'm aware of to merge their contents. I'll just leave this for now.
>>25811 and >>5975 are also basically the same. Not sure what to do about this.
>>18159 and >>14827 as well. I'll probably delete >>14827 even though it was made first, since it has no image in the catalog and has fewer posts.
>>12639 >>13153 and >>13486 are all the same. I don't know why there are three of these threads. I'll likely delete the first two soon.
There are some other similar threads I see. I really wish people wouldn't make what are effectively duplicate or only slight variations of already existing threads, but I don't want to come off as overly hostile or to discourage posting by aggressively deleting them immediately when seen, and if people have already started posting in them I'm hesitant to delete them at that point as well.

Anyway, there are more threads I'll delete when it's necessary, but there's space on the board for now.

>>33452
just create a rolling sticky for marky thread

>>33452
Candidates for deletion, some of these contributed zero content and also never even made it into double digit replies. In order of highest to lowest priority. I'm picking these out mostly because they're improperly made, low effort, off-topic, or redundant.

My definitions of "off-topic" and "improperly made" are threads that don't really fit the following:

>discussion of e-girls, 3d waifus, and any orbiting related topics.
>include the name and image of said girl in the OP. Always remember to fill out the subject field, include any relevant info and/or links in the OP

Also, I think some of the less noteworthy thread subjects can stand to be deleted, some of these are just bumped by their OP dumping pics. IMO, something like https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/12405.html#25667 is basically /b/ or /gif/ tier trash and its contents would be more fitting in a the /qtgen/ or something, as I feel an entire individual thread was unnecessary for someone so random with such little demand, as well as with such little information/incentive for the thread to be upkept.

What is not "noteworthy" or "deserving of a thread" is honestly up to your discretion, but I'd say "low content", "non-established", and "nothing more than an OP" are good enough qualifiers for deletion. That being said:

https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/12908.html literally just a request thread going off a single picture of a random (Age: 1 yr 4 mo)
https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/12405.html same thing as above (Age: 1 yr 4 mo)
https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/17847.html low content & non-established, and made obsolete by /qtgen/ (Age: 10 months)
https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/8871.html
Quite literally just a random blogpost by an underage OP that has nothing to do with this board, arguably low content and probably a LARPer. (Age: 1 yr 8 mo)
https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/9830.html Low effort, zero content (Age: 1 yr 8 mo)
https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/4661.html https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/5454.html Posted 1 mo apart, one of them is redundant
https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/5108.html Last bumped 2 years ago. Aligns with the topic of https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/18815.html which in itself is useful for containing these stray threads, and still gets bumped to this day, so the former can stand to be deleted as no real content is lost from the board

Threads that aren't necessarily deletion worthy, but I'd still consider superfluous:
https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/16909.html https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/17847.html https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/25533.html https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/11461.html These "chart" threads, which seem to not contribute much other than create a containment for "general new e-girl discussion." I feel like I've seen multiple of them on the board at once, many of them going months without getting bumped, and they're often repetitive and low effort. However, I will admit they are on topic. I believe a better approach would be to compartmentalize the contents of these threads into individual ones for each girl, and only if the girl herself is "established" (some of the girls in these "chart" threads already have their own threads with more productive and worthwhile posts) Honestly, the e-boy thread is the least offensive of the batch because it's unique, but even some of the guys here there have their own individual threads which are of a much higher quality (Seymour)

>>34081
Don't know what the solution to preventing non-deletion worthy but low-quality threads from being made. My first though would be one or two more stickied generals that are all-encompassing for a certain topic which gets repeatedly mentioned, the "woman-hate containment thread" seemed effective at that. I'm also unsure whether or not agatha2 would benefit from a rule along the lines of "Before you create a thread, check the catalog to see if someone has already made one" to contain redundant threads that could just be effectively contained as a reply into an already established thread, https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/4984.html should've just been kept in the Agatha thread. I also feel now that there is a /qtgen/ things like the content of the "chart" threads can just be redirected there. This board generally works best when all-encompassing threads with a very specific subject are maintained for multiple months (for the large names, 8 threads can be stretched to last multiple years) while the more vague and less interesting ones https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/16909.html have very little reason to be maintained or continuously bumped, and inevitably die out and just clog up the board. Something about the vagueness of these threads I think creates a net negative, since they don't really have to include any names, links, relevant info, and it is assumed the girls mentioned are already known, and any replies to them about specific girls would be better off in said girl's dedicated thread. Last bit was just me rambling, but that's my two cents. All the other mentioned threads preceding this paragraph would be better off purged.

>>34081
>>34082
The input is appreciated.

Deleted:
>>8871 (I always found this thread incredibly sad. I hope the OP is okay.)
>>12908 (This thread was obviously complete garbage from the beginning, though 'dickanon' was an amusing character.)
>>17847 (Not a terrible idea for a thread, and probably different enough of a premise from /qtg/ that it could have been maintained, but the OP abandoned it immediately after making it so whatever.)
>>9830 (It's still over though.)
>>4661 (>>5454 has more and more recent posts so we'll keep that.)
>>5108 (I'm not sure it really fits into >>18815 but I actually should have deleted this a long time ago anyway.)
>>16909 (obsolete chart thread.)

>>12405 I'm going to leave up. There are a number of posters in the thread so at least some people are interested in it + there are too many posts/images for it to comfortably fit into something like /qtg/ or misc egirls.

The chart/collage threads have been a persistent problem especially with how low effort and poorly made most of them are, and we've deleted several of them in the past. I'm not entirely opposed to them having their own thread, they're unique enough of a concept, allowing general discussion of recent, specifically /r9k/ related girls and trends, which some people seem to want, and a lot of the girls on the charts don't really need their own threads—these threads allow some minor discussion of them. But these charts/collages really need to be confined to one individual thread i.e. something like a "General R9K Chart/Collage Thread" or similar. It is completely unnecessary to create a new thread for every chart with minor variations, the new ones making the old ones obsolete, and it won't be allowed going forward.

The e-boy thread I'm not really a fan of but it may be useful as a containment for other garbage, so I'll leave it.

I might just create an "Off-Topic" or sort of general discussion thread that could serve to encompass some of the lower quality threads being made, and also to contain some of the irrelevant posts that have been being made in other threads. Threads like >>33849 (which we'll remove once it slides) and >>11180 and the various other "It's Over"-style ones could reasonably be contained in that. The Off-Topic threads on /agatha/ were actually some of the most active. I think most everything else can fit into already existing threads. Low-quality/low-effort threads that don't really contribute anything of value or gain any traction we'll just start deleting more frequently.

>I'm also unsure whether or not agatha2 would benefit from a rule along the lines of "Before you create a thread, check the catalog to see if someone has already made one"
I'll add that to the sticky, I should have before really.

not him, but >>12405 is a just a bunch of brazilians drooling over a 4/10 white camwhore who is not even an e-girl and is /b/ tier trash. I wouldn't incourage the creation of threads like that but you do you.

>>34118
Make pic related into a banner :^3

>>37517
Kill yourself

Is there any specific reason Gilbert has not been permabanned yet?

>>38377
In general I don't like to permanently ban posters unless it's for something egregious. Gilbert is incredibly annoying, yes, but he does occasionally make relevant posts, though, admittedly, those are few and far between. But, his constant off-topic and attention-seeking posting that derails threads is getting out-of-hand at this point and is a problem that can't continue in perpetuity, I don't disagree with that. We've already given him several short-term bans to attempt to deter him from this behaviour, though these do not seem to have had the desired effect. If he continues, the next step is to give him longer-term bans, including possibly permanent, which we'll consider soon.

I've set up a poll on the Gilbert Question to gauge the opinions of the board's users on this issue, which we'll take into consideration. It would be helpful if people would vote in this: https://strawpoll.com/w4nWrN0kNyA

>>38384
Thanks for the response. His case is atypical due to his known history predating this board and the fact that any engagement with his attention whoring only encourages him to stick around while branching out even further, like he is now posting about talking to middle school girls he met through here. Seems like genuinely bad optics to allow him to stay for that reason alone. It’s very weird to see him go back and forth between guilt and trying to stir the pot with bait, which some people call delusions but are clearly attempts at controlling the narrative to make him feel less guilty. He’s using this board to cope and it’s both annoying for us and unhealthy for him.

>>38384
Finally, thanks.

>>38390
I think because somebody tried to groom an e-girl a decade ago shouldn't except them from bans. Or any knowledge in general, even though his has been completely pointless for a long time now.

>>38468
To be honest, I'm surprised it took this long to permaban him.

>>38468
Thank you based BO.

>>38485
My exact thoughts word for word.

>>38468
He and Medoi are still posting here together.

There's good news gilly-kun. You are not really permabanned. You are banned only until Nov 19 2028.

BO, G-pedo is telling everyone he's close friends with you and "the entire mod team" and is convinced he's the one getting all these threads taken down with "secret codes."

>>39126
Looking into it.
>>39601
Well, I think it should be obvious this isn't true. I'd never heard of this guy until he showed up a few months ago and he has no influence on anything here.

>>39649
BO, he wrote this!

>>40106
Added. 👍

the new counter is ugly as fuck. these threads read like a spreadsheet.

>>40234
ngl the previous post counter looked aesthetically better

This is the best one imo. I like having the post counter and sage on the right.

>>40277
this one, but with SAGE and #166 in inverted places, so that the post number is always on the far right even without SAGE

>>40276
what was wrong with the previous counter? it was already looking fine to me. I think that what needs to be fixed or disabled is the counter on regular pages (1,2,..16). having a counter that goes from 0 to 6 for each thread doesn't make much sense to me.

Alright, I've reverted the counter back to it's original style and placement. I think that's the cleanest looking variation.
Added the fix for thumbs as well.

Your ban has been lifted.

Let's discuss the moderation team.
Most of you are fine, but there is a mod who clearly abuses his powers and is biased by personal feelings and preferences. He keeps creating discussions in every thread and then deletes posts from people who disagree with him, like what just happened in Kaya's thread . He is obviously the same person who whiteknights for and is obsessed with Ken and has a personal crusade against 'bert. Probably the same mod who made the pukara flop.
This obnoxious person shouldn't be allowed to moderate, or should stop using the board as a normal user while moderating.

>>41650
Yeah, it's clear that this post isn't being made in good faith and most of your statements are mischaracterizations and outright falsehoods, and that isn't a basis for a genuine discussion, which I don't believe you're interested in having in the first place, but I'll try to clear a few things up.
>He keeps creating discussions in every thread and then deletes posts from people who disagree with him
This isn't happening.
>like what just happened in Kaya's thread
Posters were told to stop explicit pedophilic discussion and to not make posts that could be interpreted as sexualizing persons underage, which the entire thread had devolved into by that point, requiring moderators to intervene, and posts engaging in such were deleted. Posters who continued to engage in such were and will be banned. This is the problem with these retards, they have no tact, they don't know when to stop, you give them an inch and they take a mile and they will keep pushing the limit, so it's necessary to crackdown before it gets out of hand. Posts of this nature add nothing of value to the board and will not be allowed here. We don't need posts about how 'breedable' some 14 year old is, we don't need posts about how the age of consent is only 13 in wherever-the-fuck, we don't need the "uh, being sexually attracted to 12 year olds isn't pedophilia," we don't need "if she bleeds shes ready to bleed" (actual quote from one of the deleted posts.) It fosters an element that we don't want here. This should not be a difficult concept to grasp. If you want to have in-depth discussions about how much you want to fuck kids go somewhere else.
>He is obviously the same person who whiteknights for and is obsessed with Ken and has a personal crusade against 'bert
Hilarious. And you are obviously the same person who whiteknights for Gilbert Raborg the Pedophile and spammed the link to his failed knock-off board here. If you have such an issue with the way this place is run maybe you and 'bert can go and suck each other off there.

>>41665
No, I think that 'bert should have been banned 1 year ago when he started spamming and saying that a sexually developed 15-16 yo is attractive is not pedophilia. You need to learn to put aside personal preferences amd bias when moderating.
Your obsession with Ken is unhealthy anyway.

>>41665
Also be aware that the discord invasion is all your fault.

>>41669
You're saying that you aren't the person who spammed his board here? Because I know that you are, I mean, I can fucking see that you are, so I don't know why you'd try to deny that. You think he should have been banned when he started spamming a year ago? He wasn't even here a year ago! And, anyway, he's banned now. And yet you keep bringing him up. Constantly. All over the board. You even created a thread on his board! Odd thing to do if you say you wanted him banned a year ago. I don't think you're being serious. Do you think you should have been permanently banned when you started spamming the link to his board here? Because that's something we considered. Was it wrong of us to show leniency?

Your comments in the Sunny thread weren't anything egregious, and they were mostly removed due to the larger context of the thread at the time they were posted. There's no need to get so bent out of shape about it. And I honestly have no idea what bias you could possibly be inferring from any of the actions taken.

I don't even know what this meme about my(?) supposed obsession with Kennedi is about.

>>41670
Ah, but you are one of the Discordfags, as I can glean from your posts. Strange, very strange. Maybe it's your fault? Hm.

>>41675
lol you having a schizo breakdown or what?

>>41676
That's the best you can come up with?

>>41677
Are you serious or are you baiting? WTF?

>>41678
What points are you even contesting?

>>41680
You just demonstrated once again that you are incapable of being an impartial mod, throwing baseless schizo accusations against me. If you can't put aside your personal grudges and preferences, you should stop moderating and just post as a regular user.
Your attitude and your personal crusade against 'bert caused the recent invasion. You should have just banned him silently when he started spamming his emoji (1 year ago was an approximation).

>>41675
By the way, whatever post history you were looking at, you are quite mistaken because I use this board over Tor. Tor ips are shared among a group of different users. When I post I often get an error, like you have been banned for cp spam or spam/advertising, even though I've never posted any of that.
If you want the CP spam to end, all you have to do is disable Tor.

>>41691
Ignore this faggot and don't disable TOR posting. Privacy it's the most valuable thing about this board.

>>41694
I value privacy too, but it's not good promo for the board opening this website and finding in first page 7 year olds spreading their asshole or being tortured.

>>41700
When that happens, just delete cache, close the browser and come back after 10-20 mins. It's usually gone by then.

>>41675
>I don't even know what this meme about my(?) supposed obsession with Kennedi is about.
Seems to be made up by Gilbert Raborg the Pedophile and now people who like him for stirring the pot for their entertainment are repeating it. He still posts about you (claiming you are his "old friend") and Kennedi (random lies to get him more attention) on Discord every single day, and claims that *Ken groomed him* and he's a victim, all while posting about wanting to rape lolis in a civil war. It's basically a small group of people consisting of him and a handful of teens and loser 20 somethings who have no jobs. Every single day he ghostwrites things for people on discord to post here because he has some narcissistic delusion that he can destroy the board as punishment for his being banned and depriving him of another source of attention.

>>41769
I don't how much of it it's true, but now Gilbert Raborg the Pedophile is talking on discord about how different girls dmd him to tell him stuff about Ken and that she has nudes (artistic photos) that she sent to a certain Jeffrey from California in 2014.

>>41777
>I don’t know how much of it is true
Almost nothing he said has been verified at all and much of it has been either obviously fabricated or outright proven to be false. A known pedophile liar’s word against an 11-14 year old girl who isn’t even here to vouch for herself.

>>41777
whether it’s true or not, ask yourself why he sees it as appropriate to say these things about her to random people. it’s because he wants to smear her image in any way he can in order to post-hoc rationalize his past actions against her, which he knows were wrong otherwise he wouldn’t have spent years feeling bad about it. it was only a couple of months ago after a whole decade that he started to say he did nothing wrong, after people here and on discord who don’t even know ken told him she deserved what he did. now he spends every day trying to make that seem more and more true any way he can. but nothing he could say, true or false, no matter how extreme, justifies attempting to groom a child then raging so hard when rejected that you doxx and spam the kid across 8chan for two years with your /baphomet/ buddies who saw you as a lolcow anyway.

Hello.
Letting you know. Removed two images and a webm, from couple of old threads, which were reported as csam.

>>42115
Which threads? just curious.

>>42124
The ones with the brunettes...?

if i offer to pay the board owner, can i get a thread taken off here (specifically of me)?

>>42322
maybe, who are you?

>>42326
could we talk in private somehow?

>>42334
Which thread(s)? Tell the post number(s)

>>42335
i want my thread 14691 deleted too. how much for it?

>>42341
>>42342
We are working on these. Anyone else wants their thread removed?

I request Marky thread #17 >>34632 which no longer bumps to be pinned. Heavy shitposting ensued in upcoming days.

>>42426
why the heavy shitposting forecast?

>>42426
If I were the BO, I would pin Marky threads anyways. She's the queen of this board.

>>42430 10 year anniversary + new old rares are about to be dropped, I feel it.

>>42437
Too many pinned threads are annoying to scroll past, theres enough as is. /qtg/ is especially annoying to scroll past because its all 2/10s in that thread. Frankly most of the discord girls on this board dont deserve their own thread. A discord girls general would be suitable imo. If he can make markys thread not bumplock after 500 posts that would be better.

>>42322
If you were to pay us, and we removed the thread, what would prevent us from allowing the creation of a new one which would put you in exactly the same position? I'm not sure you've thought this through.
If you seek attention on imageboards and in shady discords people are inevitably going to post about you, whether it's here or elsewhere. If you can't handle that then I suggest you not do those things. Deleting this particular thread isn't going to solve any of your self-made problems.
Besides, your suggested scenario could be interpreted by some as a form of extortion/blackmail, and I don't think it would be prudent on my part to give out any kind of payment info anyway.
I am curious how much you would have been willing to pay though. Things can always change.
>>42342
The same goes for you.

These posts >>42326 >>42335 >>42370 weren't made by me or a mod by the way.

>>42426
You guys can just go ahead and create a new thread if you want, since they've slowed way down now. In general, I don't think it's good to have a still active thread off the first page for such a long period.
>>42440
You can hide threads by clicking the [x]
It is not possible to increase the bump limit beyond 500 posts.

>>42474
>These posts >>42326 >>42335 >>42370 weren't made by me or a mod by the way.
sorry, I did some trolling eheh

>>42478
I did find it a bit amusing myself, honestly.

>>42341
Let your thread hit the bump limit and don't give anons any reason to make a new one. At the end of the day, all they do is reposting selfies and info they take from big public servers where you seek for attention.

I just had a genius idea. We should hold a competition that takes place only once a year, where the girls who want their thread removed can compete in a deathmatch.
I still have to figure out what the competition could be about, but the agatha users will vote for the winner, who will receive a lifetime pass to exit the E-Girl Purgatory (all past and future threads about her will be removed). We could make something epic, even better than the fishtank goyshow.

>>42488
They should have to see who can bake the best loaf of bread.

>>42474
>what would prevent us from allowing the creation of a new one which would put you in exactly the same position?

thats a good point. tbh the main reason i want the thread of me deleted, besides the embarrassing stuff i dont want archived, is bc someone put my full name on there. maybe you could just delete the posts including my name ig.
>I am curious how much you would have been willing to pay though
erm when i made the original statement i thought around 100-200. after considering th fact another thread would be made, ig that much isnt worth it.
>>42483
good idea, i dont like posting selfies on discord anymore anyway, theres no reason to do it beyond trying to feel existent

>>42491
Well, it isn't as if we couldn't, in addition to removing the current one, also remove any potential additional threads or posts about you in perpetuity. If you're offering $200 I wouldn't have any problem at all with doing that for you.
I only accept payment in Amazon gift cards.
If you're still interested in pursuing such an arrangement you can contact me at anonymous08978@proton.me and we can hash out the details.

>>42615
200$ to leave this purgatory forever is a really nice price. If I were an e-girl discussed here, I'd accept that instantly.

Ladies hurry up and get yourself this Christmas present before the BO changes his mind!

>>42615
>>42621
maybe you could open it to bidding in case there are any counter offers. $200 is a little low

>>42615
will the offer still be open for a while? im tight on money and need to move out, so id like to think it over/wait till i have a job again

also, with amazon gift cards: would u see my name and location if i sent one to u? idk how it works

>>42615
actualy, if i pay something around 50 now, could you at least take away the messages that have my name in them? thats more urgent, idk if itd cost more or less tho

>>42753
>will the offer still be open for a while?
Sure, there's no rush.
>would u see my name and location
No, that info wouldn't be provided to me.
>>42768
Yes, I could do that.
Send me the links to the messages you want removed here: anonymous08978@proton.me
And I'll give you a different e-mail there to send the gift card to.

a 200$ cop out lol

>>42748
>$200 is a little low
That is usually how much they can afford. I think it's a fair price.
I hope as many e-girls as possible take that offer and change their lives for the better.

>>42791
just delete the board faggot

$200 is half a month salary in Brasil or Russia. Good dough. Anyways, maybe I'm late, but wanted to propose donating portion of this sum towards server hosting since we're the second most active board on this site. At some point we gotta chip in.
https://endchan.org/.static/donations.html

>>43033
we're already contributing with all the ad revenue we generate with our clicks

>>42834
I thought your mom was blocking this site?

What do you guys think of this holiday theme? Do you love it? Do you hate it? Let me know in the comments. I Stole it from >>>/ausneets/

>>43384
Currently, links (which is "a" in css) are orange. That's why /ausneets/ is visible even though it's spoilered. You need to make links in css black, or change the spoiler color to dark orange. To do the former:

Replace

a {
    color: darkorange;
}

to this:

a {
    color: black;
}

Or to change spoiler color add this:

span.spoiler {
    background: darkorange;
    color: darkorange;
    padding: 0 1px;
}

Also, preformatted text is a little unreadable due to the background color and font being similarly colored. If you add the following, it will make the background color for preformatted text to dark red. You can change the hex color code to a color you like. Here's what you'd add:

pre {
    font-size: initial;
    display: block;
    background: #450101;
    padding: 0.4em;
}

>>43384 Thank you, now my eyeballs are festively moisturized and sparkling with tears of joy, retinas are tingling in anticipation of upcoming fun. Yes, green counter looks atrocious. Change green to #faebd7 (antiquewhite). Same can can be done to role labels instead of red on red:

.labelRole {
  color: #faebd7;
}

>>43390 You forgot condition of spoiler being hovered

.spoiler:hover {
    color: inherit;
    background-color: inherit;
}

>>43390
>>43412
Added these changes, thanks.

I used to like the old agatha theme ( https://archive.is/rIZ91 ). It has more personality than the normal one which is identical to lolcow. Can you bring it back pls?

Essayposter I lifted the ban on your IP. It wasn't intended for you, you just strangely happen to have the exact same hash as another poster who was banned and I know isn't you. I'm not sure how that's happened or what to do about it. I was about to ask if you were still able to post before I saw your appeal. Apologies for the inconvenience.

The face of someone who has spent the entire past day spamming this board.

>>43846
potato with bad haircut, wearing glasses in a bid to obscure her ugly face

>>43846
LMFAO

>>43817
No problem at all, don't worry about it. Thanks for the quick fix.

>>43846
lmfao thank you based BO for exposing her. what was she spamming? didn’t see anything different going on. was she targeting anyone in particular?

>>43893
>>43846
nvm, now i see she was spending christmas eve bumping every single thread but her own and saying that “ken loves pedo cock” because medoi herself orbits groomer gil

>>43893
she wanted to kill bee's thread for some reason

>>43898
Envy is one hell of a drug.

>>42488
If it's "deathmatch" then they should fight to the death. Whoever lives gets their thread erased. Whoever dies will continue to live in Purgatory.

Merry Christmas everyone. Appreciate all of you.

>>45516
that second pic is brootal, man

equality before the law, but some people are more equal than others depending on your genetics (randomness)

this soyciety is a fucking joke

>>45516
On the 2nd image it looks like they favored the more attractive lol

>>45798
Impossible!

Everybody knows that there's no such thing as "the more attractive". Everybody knows that beauty is in the eye of the beholder (just like elementary particles). Heh.

>>45516
second pic i was expecting all women with 0 years and then have a dude who got like 30-40 years at the bottom

Since the woman hate thread doesn't seem to bump:
Every male needs to read this:
https://murderpedia.org/female.F/f/fazekas-julia.htm

tl;dr: men go to war, women cheat on them with hostile prisoners of war, they return war-worn, often crippled, 28-51 women conspire to kill their husbands, but sometimes kill their new lovers too, sometimes male relatives, sometimes male child.
Feminist coverage on the topic:"uh.. their husbands were probably abusive, this was an uprise against the oppressive patriarchy!"

>>45998
Even doe looks are objective as the blackpill = truth

>>27
admin why is thread creation locked for me? also perma ban the pedrophile that keeps posting disgusting crap for gods sake ew

Hello.

Lately the board started becoming a problem. I don't know if new posters getting the wrong idea, or oldfag schizos getting more bold, but things start to look way too funky. We - the staff of the Board, the Owner and Volunteers included - have to be more clear that /agatha2/ is for discussing these egirls, and not for harassing them, or encouraging the harassment, or encouraging contact in general, doesn't matter if she is a minor or adult. This community isn't about that. This really has to be clear for all visitors.
Now, those egirls who decide to post, if they are 18 or older, we can't stop them using the site.
Writing something lewd about a teenager isn't illegal, though can be creepy depending. But posting a picture of a child, like 12 and under, and writing lewd comments about that, or editing a cock next to the photo, that won't fly, it never did. And in general uploading photos of kids and I'm not talking about "literal kids" - how that troll is so fond of posting it... in threads with lewd comments is also a no go.

As a personal interjection:
I know at least one of you will try to rule-lawyer this, or gonna try to set this as canon and try to reserve the right for himself to account us if we don't keep to it to the word - either claim overreach, or label us as hypocrites. Autists, schizos, and trolls never change. I also know that users post questionable stuff. If I judge one day that something has to go, and on another that is similar but it's fine - or the other way around -, you just have to live with it. To be frank, nothing is too late to delete, but I/we don't delete things randomly.
Now while I typing, I'd like to thank for the BO and Vols to clip the usual spam quick.

Besides all this, U.S. Code Title 18, Chapter 110, § 2251 always applies.

>>54544
It does seem there are some new posters who are maybe causing problems. There's been a lot of, in my view, low-quality and hateful posting lately. Mostly what I've seen though is just persistent negative comments about the girls in threads here without it going any further than that—I don't necessarily agree with that kind of behaviour or like the general tone of the board recently but as long as that's the full extent of it and certain lines aren't crossed I don't feel it's my place to intervene. I haven't seen much of anyone engaging in what I would consider to constitute real harassment, or the encouraging of harassment, or taking anything outside of the board itself. There's been a large volume of posts lately, though, so I haven't been able to personally monitor all of them, so maybe I missed some things, but I don't think I've seen anything about harassment or the like in the report queue, either. I definitely don't want this board to be used as a platform for any kind of actual harassment, so I'll look more into it and make sure the Vols watch out for it as well, and consider action against problem posters.

Posts explicitly sexualizing underages or making lewd comments I don't want or allow on the board—these are usually deleted by the mods when seen, and I think several posters have been banned for making such posts—but it's possible a few slip through the cracks. I'll make sure the mods are on the lookout for this sort of thing as well.

Thanks for bringing these issues to our attention so we can attempt to remedy them.

Owner, can you do something about this guy "Kam"? He keeps spamming Ika's threads.

https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/55249.html

He's obsessed and says he doesn't want to stop. Ban him or something. At this rate there will be 50 Ika threads by the end of the year.

>>55563
Its basically a Kam thread where Ika is brought up every now and then.

>>55581
no shes constantly being brought up, by kam

Yo admin please delete this trash.

https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/39897.html

Ashley doesn't want this kind of stuff up anymore and the thread has turned into a bunch of infighting and trolling between fans and normie white knights.

This shit needs to finally end.

>>55591
>>55563
i didn't really bring ika up unless it was related to me, i just brought myself up and shilled myself a lot cuz i'm a narcissistic piece of shit
i'm not gonna do it anymore, i was just laughing too hard and trying to entertain ppl; i'm on a trip perma now
sorry for the trouble

>>55784
You're still fucking posting, asshole

How can I contact the staff or board owner on email?

>>56793
You can contact here if need be: anonymous08978@proton.me

>E-Girl Purgatory
Is a misnomer, it implies process of purgation. This place however, always stays the same. An E-girl Limbo.

Responded to the e-mails that were sent; apologies for the late replies.

>>55563
Looks like the issue with this Kam guy was taken care of for the most part?
There are more issues in those threads, though. I do not at all like what occurred in them and I don't think it was good for the board and I don't think it will be allowed to happen again. Flooding and spamming threads with low-effort/low-quality hateposts, impairing their proper functioning, making them unusable for other posters, and engaging in explicit campaigns to harass other posters off the board, these things are really not acceptable and won't be going forward. There is just no benefit to the board in this kind of conduct. Especially when these threads being flooded with garbage necessitates the creation of more and more threads that are also inevitably filled with garbage.

As well I'll say that recently there are several posters who seemingly do not post anything on this board besides low-effort hateposts, in multiple threads, and if that's all you're going to contribute to this board then there is no benefit to your continuing to post here; so I'd encourage these posters to perhaps reflect on and alter their behaviour.
>>55622
I think it's probably fine for that thread to remain up. I don't see any reason to remove it altogether.
>>57828
Maybe limbo is more accurate, I'm not sure. It used to be 'E-Girl Paradise,' so the Purgatory thing was just kind of a play on that. Though, in a way, maybe what occurs here could be thought of as constituting a process of purgation. I suppose it depends on how you look at it.

>>58538
>>58541
What's the deal with pvkara threads you mongoloid? Why are you deleting them?

>>61280
out of curiosity, how could the banned guy evade the filter (pedrophile) ?

>>61280
Why do you only ban puk from here but not the other underage girls who get posted? Just admit it, she's too based?

MODS PLEASE JUST EXPLAIN WHY YOU BAN PUK BUT NOT THE OTHER GIRLS

>>61284
They're just replacing one of the characters in the filtered word.
>>61285
>>61308
Because of her specific history and the nature of her "fanbase" and the dynamic this inevitably creates in the threads. Basically, her threads are filled with pedrophiles who keep posting weird shit. There is nothing similar going on anywhere else on the board. There are no girls as young as her being posted anywhere else on the board. Her orbiters have also consistently been shitting up other threads, so that's another problem. There's just no benefit to the board in hosting these threads here and so we've decided not to.

>>61280
>>61335
Very based, thank you.

IM NOT A pedro HELLO!!!

>>61562
Plz unban me I just posted in her thread to see if the word angel was censored ..

>>61562
>>61563
You are already unbanned, that's how you're able to post. Must have mistakenly banned you in the pedro purge. You should have written something in the appeal though because it almost got denied.

>>61567
The pedro purge was based thank u and good job.., I think I just misscicked appeal before being able to write something. Bless

You know your board is bad when the Admin of the site disagrees with your policies and thinks you're restarded

Hello mods could you edit the Iris thread I made so it says #4 instead of #3? I made a mistake

>>61887
Subjects aren't editable, so it'll have to be remade.

Come check the new board
>>>/sm/

come check new board
>>>/Ms. Bean/

>>61280
https://endchan.net/agatha2/res/61910.html

are you going to do something about this?

Hello BO, can you please answer me here >>61979

>>61980
they deleted it LMAO

>>62004
logs say someone else was banned for doxxing but it wasn't from the "You Know Who" thread
Only she is allowed to be doxxed apparently

do these gay fags think BO will give up and delete the board or admin will intervene if they keep spamming pedro shit or something?

>>62054
this post was made by the board volunteer by the way

I'm going to wait until you fall asleep and then I'm going to continue spamming

>>62084
no faggot it was made by me but good luck with your tantrum lmao. i wonder how long your resolve will last?

>>61875
fs = FatSaturn?

0b538a

>pvkara thread made
>testacc (ESL volunteer) posts her dox and leave the thread up
>won't delete the thread
>agatha2 gets spammed
>won't delete the thread
>agatha2 gets spammed
>won't delete the thread

just a lurker but it seems to me you guys are doing this to yourselves. this makes the board fucking unusable

>>62209
You are the person spamming.

>>62209
And you also made that thread.

>>62219
no way
>>62222
nice quads

>>62222
Regardless of this, dear global moderator, the jannies of this board aren't following their own rules

>>62209
>>62215
>>62219
>>62222
I DO NOT CARE ABOUT ANY OF THIS SHIT I JUST WANT TO POST ON AGATHA2 WITHOUT CONSTANT CHILD PORN SPAM

this board is shit

>>62228
>>62230
Spammer pretending to be normal users of the board.

>>62230
board fell apart when discordfags discovered it

>>62235
Interesting, how do you know this? Post his IP

there's still loli porn up in some threads btw

Why random threads are disappearing from the catalog? I wanted to make a post in the thread about the decay of orbiting culture but it's gone. Also rose thread and some others are missing. Is this a bug or something?

>>62256
i think something bad is happening. i'm worried for the future of the board. i might make a bunker somewhere else while this spam is happening. agatha2 what happened

Was tinkering with moderation script/automation while the spam was ongoing (I think it still is) to cut down effort, and accidentally a whole thread. Sorry about that.
Did some changes in the board policy, now I have to go and tend to other matters. BO/BV should delete the spammed images/posts, we can scrub the database later.

>>62272
why is the p*k thread still up tho

>>62272
>>62274
weird doesn't look like it's working

>>62273
because that is not a BO/BV that's an Admin and dox isn't illegal

>>62275
didn't know they couldn't delete it also I know dox isn't illegal but it's against the agatha2 board rules same with posting about her in general

>>62278
FUCKING STOP

>>62274
>>62278
honestly fucking disgusting

>>62275
Not 100% sure, but doxing an underage person can be labeled as harassment and thus be illegal.

The spammer is the board owner of /pukara/ btw. Some guy called FatSaturn, endchan username 'majorplayer'. Have proof I'll post later.

>>62290
if you have proof POST IT NOW, EXPOSE THIS FUCKING GUY

>>62290
literally what is stopping you from posting it now you monkey what is holding you back

>>62290
So can you confirm that this is happening because the BV/BO is ignoring a dox of a child in the thread that they supposedly don't allow? So this faggot spammer won't stop?

>>62309
>thread that they supposedly don't allow?
You mean the thread that you created? Like you've been creating it every day here since they've been banned? In addition to spamming in multiple other threads?

>>62290
>>62309
>>62316
So is this spam just going to keep happening?

is this schizo even really obsessed with redacted or is this just some gay false flag excuse to spam the board because they're butthurt about something posted here?

>>62316
Oh so the BV here is throwing a sissy hissy fit because of a personal vendetta against Pukara, I see now

Just in case my post gets deleted

So to the legit users.
It is one dude powered by autism. There is a couple like that on the scene of small imageboards.
These types also like to inject their own narration and goad and mock the moderation team. And it's easy to lose temper, I can totally understand. Legit users also should be considerate.

if you can delete the posts with loli porn or posts that you don't like then you can delete her dox, there's no reason to leave this kid's name or her parents Facebook pages on the site aside from vendetta

mod some of us, round up a posse of us good users who call this board home, and let us keep these pukara faggots out of here. im here a lot and ill do it for free

>>62341
We literally just want pukara faggots off of this board

>>62340
>>62341
>>62343
I read through this thread and it does actually seem like the BV has a personal thing against pukara...

>>62340
>vendetta
No one gives a fuck about this girl at all, dude. We want YOU to stop spamming her here, what are you not understanding, retard. We're not going to be blackmailed into doing what you want.

>>62340
>>62347
lmao
back to your containment board nigger

>>62347
I'm serious there's no other reason to leave her dox up if it's against the rules
also if you're the loli spammer fucking kys

>>62348
I'm not the loli spammer get your head out of your ass I want this faggot off the board so I can post about Agatha without having to see fucking child porn

>>62352
okay well then tell your little discord buddy to fuck off

>>62352
calm down dude I'm not the spammer

ok you caught me I am. just delete her dox

>>62347
(This IP has never posted her before today)

>>62358
*here

so the lolispammer has some kind of vendetta against this girl and is assmad he can't keep posting about her here so now he's spamming about her and posting her dox while acting like he's protecting her? lol what a retard

>>62356
you're going to burn in hell and you know it you freak

>>62362
you have zero reading comprehension dude

>>62366
don't tell me you thought your act was actually convincing tardbro?

>>62340
LOL IM NOT FAT SATURN IM A GIRL CRY ABOUT IT AJAJHAHAHA

I have seen a lot of board disruption attempts in my day and I have to say this has been one of the weakest most ineffectual displays I've ever seen. probably raised by a single mother or two dads.

>>62362
he is actually her 'fan' (man who's obsessed with some kid) who ban evades and spams her here and now he's really angry that something he doesn't like was posted in the thread he created and so he's throwing a fit

>>62370
this. pathetic attempt.

also I know your time zone. drink energy drinks tonight

it's cool, I get paid to sit on my ass all day. I'm going to pay a bunch of indians to spam agatha2 tonight. tell the global mod. also prepare to explain all this to octave

I can't in good conscience even call this guy a spammer. my grandmother could spam a board more effectively than this and she's tech-illiterate and dead

>>62368
yeah, that one was my bad, b. you don't usually post from that IP

>>62376
I don't know a quick look through the logs proves you wrong. as long as I keep you glued to your phone or computer I'm happy

>>62377
I forgive you, I will now fuck off to simp for Agatha

>>62378
trying to keep someone glued to their device by being glued to yours

hmmmm good luck with that chief lmao that'll get em

>>62380
reading comprehension. I am paying ppl

don't let your guard down for the next week.

also if you're going just based on IPs ur schizo. IPs don't say much about identity anymore

>>62382
paying to spam a niche imageboard, it doesn't get much more pathetic than that lol.. well actually, i guess you could be an adult man obsessed with some ugly underage spic and devote every waking moment of your life to her

>>62382
for this kind of performance I'd ask for a refund tbh and tell those guys to go back to spammer school

>>62386
>>62388
spammers got no balls LOLOLOL. waste of space and life. retard honestly

>pay for spammers
>nearly no signs of spam
think you got scammed bro

>>62388
they are indians apparently not much good that's gonna do

>>27
>ugly underage spic
with all due respect m8 there's a lot of ugly girls out there and she isn't one of them. that being said I'm not attractive to a 15-year-old but I can definitely say she's pretty in the objective sense. if she was really ugly I don't think there would be this much hubbub about her

>>62407
>attractive
attracted........*

>>62407
>this much hubbub
but it's just one pedrotard having a fit?

>>62417
Oh okay. I thought she had two threads up within two days and that there was a whole band of discussion on her. I thought a new rule was literally created on agatha2 for her. I also thought that there was no doxing on this board

>>62420
yeah we already know you made the threads and doxxed her. good for you

>>62420
The majority of posts in those threads were one guy (you) IP hopping and samefagging

BV, let's have a discussion in private. What's your email?

>>62427
you know that's not true in either of those threads that were made. you don't even know who I am. I want to know why you are keen on hurting pukara when it's these orbiters who are bothering you? do you think hurting pukara is an effective way to get at her orbiters?

>>62427
if you think those threads are samefagging is every thread 1 person ip hopping? Or are you just saying that to justify your bias? If those threads had samefagging the mod would have stepped in but they didn't because she simply has more fans than you, roastie

>>62427
tbh this is unlikely to be true. pukara's threads on r9k have 200/400+ posts every time, while iris and vamp's threads die within 50 posts...

>>62430
>samefagging
>mods would step in
actually this retarded or just pretending?

>>62432
they are suppressing our beautiful angel

>>62430
they are just assuming it really

>>62434
There are examples of mods calling out samefagging. I guess you're just being ignorant on purpose lol. Here's an example >>28874

>>62432
no one cares about your board for lonely and depressed trans teens

>>62429
>>62430
>>62435
>>62436
>>62438
No matter how many times you change IPs, I'm going to clock you every time.

>>62436
test

>>62731
weird, i can post here but i can't view the entire thread

>>62733
why

>>62733
lol

>>27
is anyone else getting a 404 on this thread?