>>18251
.org is behind CloudFlare and we had to redirect because it helps out with the flood. It is temporary, we are still battling with the spam, and will find a solution.
I suggest using Lokinet, our address is on our home page. It is similar to Tor, but a bit faster. But can be fiddly depending on your tech knowledge.
It can be done via Tor too, and that needs only the Tor browser, but it will probably slower.

>>18252
It seems such difficulty for Board Owners getting into our accounts would cause more spam to fester. Why isn't the feature available on .org?

>>18262
CloudFlare caches agressively and sometimes happens that after login someone else's account is displayed. It is unusable, so can't change things, but can expose email address, if one added it.

Now it's possible to log in on .org. But please be aware the possibility of the aforementioned issue.

>>18274
Thanks. I don't believe I have added any email addresses. That does sound like a problem issue. As long as it's unusable though.

>>18267
>our position is that the content is harmful due to the context or location in which it is being made publicly available.
Interesting opinion, given Endchan administration's demonstrated hostility to CP. While there has been some cat and mouse games from CP raiders and suchlike, it all clearly shows Endchan stance. As said, the context of the thread and board show it was not a CP advocacy discussion.
That one post does feel like a drive-by cat and mouse troll though.
I think I'll fall back on my earlier reasoning regarding violent content posting on Endchan. I appreciate Odilitime stance and approach to free speech content. However, Endchan has a lot of other users and content that should be protected over and above one meaningless drive-by post.
>>18277
On the other hand, if he chooses to leave things be, it's probably best not to publicly commit to a course of action until someone pulls that trigger. Meanwhile, he could just point to the site's rules and history of active CP suppression, invite further user discussion, and wait.

>>18277
>>18278
If you don't mind I don't separate my replies.
If our users wish the image deleted we aren't against it. On a quicker chan, on a more active board it was probably already gone.
It is still up, because the aforementioned facts still stand: the photo doesn't depict anything illegal, and the context of the thread and the posts around don't make it suggestive or "obscene". The intent of the poster might have been trolling, but trolling isn't illegal either. We don't promote csam with keeping it up, and if anything with this discussion started we might be able to raise awareness of existing problems.
Great example would be the cp spam Endchan is regularly attacked with - which we never hesitate to remove - , and from what I saw, read it seems other imageboards are effected by it too. I highly doubt any of our users interested in clicking those links, someone still run that spam again and again, for years now.
For now the image remains, the input from users are welcomed, basically any comment about the topic, if it should be taken down and why, or about the contents of the mail (>>18268 yeah, wtf; also >>18269 "cp star" wtf), or this organization which sent the mail, etc.
>US Government sends
Cybertip.ca doesn't seem like an institution of the Canadian government, what I can gather from the about pages, it looks like it is run by a private organization (although it is acknowledged and supported by Canadian govt. - so they claim, to what extent, it is not clear from a superficial read).
From us the US Govt. can sleep peacefully, we got their backs covered and do our job. I believe if we aren't quick enough, or a post with actual csam falls through the cracks, and don't get deleted in a significant amount of time, our users will make reports.

>>18279
Forgot role signature for validation.

That's Masha. Do not image search her. You have to be familiar with CP to know she's involved in CP. Any idea from our Russian bros for what the sign says?

>>18279
>basically any comment about the topic, if it should be taken down and why
My additional concerns are the further identification of what could be the victims name, potential location of the victim, and how to potentially find more content using a resource hosted by this site (>>18281). It is disgusting.

How about hiding them with custom css?

>>18265
Is this possible? If so what do I put in my custom .css to do so?

>>18271
I will take a look.

>>18271
You can select these particular elements you want to hide with the :nth-child(x) selector, where the x is the number of the element.
The elements of the form is in the table and the "Password" and "Drawing" fields are in the 5th and 6th table rows, or in the 4th and 5th if you force anonymity via your board's settings (ie. no "Name" field).
Then you can use display: none; css rule to hide elements (there are other options, if you prefer something else you can use that ofc);
Since no other table rows on the page you could use the following:

tr:nth-child(4), tr:nth-child(5) {
  display: none;
}

Or:

tr:nth-child(5), tr:nth-child(6) {
  display: none;
}

Depending on the Name field, as I wrote above. This is important, you don't want to hide captcha accidentally or something.

Last time I tried lokinet the site complained it can't login on http.
So lurking and posting is fine, but not moderating.
Maybe we'll make the new frontend work with lokinet properly.

>>11968
>>11978
got to look at this today and it is now fixed.

>>11989
Thanks for fixing it. Posting from Lokinet mirror.

>>10487
no new but may have been broken. Not sure I did anything specific to fix it.

>>10488
Ah. Might have been my end
>>10486
>>10485
>>10484
I've isolated this. If you type the captcha in only in the reply form at the top of the thread and then hit enter while still clicked in that box it will take you to a new page saying either 'post successful, click here to return to thread' or throw a captcha error. Every other method of posting (clicking new reply button in top form, clicking new reply button in quick reply form, hitting enter in new reply form's captcha box) will just post and stay on the thread's page. Minor issue but a strange one.

How the work's going?

so is this the big thing that happens on the 20th?

Is it happening or what?

>>11645
make an account
log in
create board
will give moar detailed instructions upon request

>>11645
Maybe have a good board concept and audience for it so the board stays active for as long as possible. Inviting people you know to it is a good idea too

>open captcha in new tab
wtf

>wrong answer or expired captcha
click Reload

https://2hu-ch.org/

it's the same server as endchan's public address

except it's probably just as alive, oh well.
at least i actually make sure it's working good. mostly.

>>10257
>click reload
I did, 20 times, and it kept saying "wrong answer or expired captcha". that's the issue

>wtf
if you can complete no cookie captcha with javascript disabled in the same tab then post some screenshots and a tutorial

>>10253
<works for me
learn to type faggot

>>10264
kill yourself illiteratespergy

It's >>>/turul/291 I messed up.

Sure. Give us a day or two.

>>11628
Hello,
please link the offending post(s) and your information here or email it to me at jewsdid911@airmail.cc and I will look at it.
Regards,
die4israel.
EndChan Administrator

Regarding DMCA requests read this: >>11517
The very short version, if we find enough:
- commentary
- criticism
- parody
then it is fair use and we don't delete posts or threads.

>>11633
I already handle this case no worry
-die4israel

Darknet markets are offsite services unrelated to Endchan. Everyone discusses the merits of various filesharing sites all the time, for example. Talking about offsite services ain't illegal. Offers for purchasing specific services made here directly could be. So, create the board and get on with it. Two things:
1. Don't expect anything discussed to remain secret. If it's discussed here, it's public.
2. Endchan itself is not a darknet market. It wouldn't work as one anyway.

>>11528
Thanks, will do

>>11527
Essentially this >>11528
But you might be better of making and maintaining (keep it alive, report posts if they are violating the rules) a thread on /b/ for example. It might get more attention than a board that needs to be shilled to get noticed.
In general one should take into consideration how much demand could be for a certain topic. In my experience - and this only need a look onto the board list - those boards are successful (on our level) which were created by existing communities who essentially moved here.
Also you might wanna expand the subject matter to darknet services, to widen the circle of possible posters.