well thanks for psychoanalyzing me, what am I supposed to reply since you've already decided what I'm all about? I can only answer in kind by saying that you seem compelled to rebuke me and minimize my claims because you feel hurt and threatened by the possibility that what you perceive as ken's authenticity might be questioned. I might be right, but seriously, who cares about your feelings or your psychology? if you're resorting to ad hominem arguments because you're uncapable of criticizing the content of my assertions, I'm not interested in this kind of discussion. I know I'm going to sound patronizing, but fuck it: you literally said that you don't get it, and believe me, it shows.
for the record, I never said that kennedi or people in general should have 0 internet presence, and it pisses me off when someone twists and takes what I say to extremes in order to discredit it, it's dishonest af. look, if it makes you feel better, I don't think ken is in bad faith, I don't think she's fake either, but genuine passion and showing off are not mutually exclusive, are they? well, they are if you can only think in black and white and can't resist the urge of taking sides, which is another thing that pisses me off immensely (yes, there are many of those things, it's a miracle I haven't had a heart attack yet).
my going back and forth about kennedi was due to the fact that I hadn't made my mind up about her until recently, because I'm so much one of the obsessive and stalking crazies that I hadn't that much information about her, so I was testing the waters and seeing what happened as things went along. my conclusions are based on the fact that I'm highly sensitive to certain things, I've observed them and thought about them for quite some time, so I notice them quite easily. but my little opinion about her is not important in itself, right? my idiosyncrasies aside, I decided to share my perspective mainly because I thought that pointing out some contradictions, which are ultimately complicit in the idealization fantasies you're gripped by, is an interesting subject of discussion in a broader sense, and a potential source of self-awareness for anybody involved.
but my specific opinion about ken's authenticity... really? who gives a shit about that. and who gives a shit about ken, for that matter. if you want to believe that she's her majesty the queen, that she's too cool and perfect for your unworthy ass, that she's unattainable, a gigastacy out of your league, that she's pure, innocent and authentic, that she farts perfume and shits chrysanthemums, that pigs will fly and hell will freeze, or whatever gives your hopelessly romantic heart a thrill, then go ahead, it's your own business and you unironically have my blessing. yes, I've just made a caricature of your position, how do you like that?>>11510
form your own opinion or fuck off